Determination of the Risk of Oil and Gas Offshore Pipelines in Indonesia: A Risk-Based Analysis Approach for Developing Inspection Strategy Policy

Main Article Content

M. Bharata Purnama Putra
Johny W. Soedarsono
Deni Ferdian
Rini Riastuti
Mirza Mahendra
Joko Hadi Wibowo

Abstract

 Indonesia has a target of producing 1 million BOPD of oil and 12 BSCFD of natural gas in 2030. The strategy for achieving the production target in 2030 is transformation from resources to production, accelerating chemical EOR, massive connectivity for finding large wells, and optimizing field production. In optimizing existing field production, one of the supporting factors is production facilities, so production facilities with good integrity are needed to minimize upplanned shutdowns. One of the oil and gas installations that pose a high risk is the installation of oil and gas pipelines. The existing pipeline installation in the Java Sea, from North Cirebon to the Seribu Islands, has an area of 8300 km2 and is operated by PT XYZ. Therefore, it requires complete and accurate inspection data to find out. This research method uses a modification of the Kent Mulhbauer scoring index. The risk level of the three subsea pipelines at Company XYZ, namely 4 in Gas Line Mike Mike, 8 in Gas Line Echo pipeline, and 8 in Gas Line Mike Mike pipeline, is found to be in the very highrisk category. The inspection strategy carried out for the third pipe with a very high risk category is visual inspection (ROV), freespan assessment, cathodic protection check (CP), UT thickness inspection on the riser and elbow (topside and subsea), and UT thickness inspection on the bottom pipe sea using the NACE ICDA method for thickness taking points and inspection periods once every 4 years or based on risk-based inspection (RBI). The cost and effort of examining the strategy will be assessed directly with the level of the risk category. Because of this, so that the inspection of the strategy can be optimal, effective, and efficient, it is divided into 3 (three) risk categories, namely low, medium, and high/very high, where the selection of strategy inspection is appropriate with the level of risk. The results of this study are expected to be a reference in making a policy or regulation to carry out regular inspections of underwater pipelines by using the risk analysis method to determine the inspection strategy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
M. Bharata Purnama Putra, Johny W. Soedarsono, Deni Ferdian, Rini Riastuti, Mirza Mahendra, & Joko Hadi Wibowo. (2024). Determination of the Risk of Oil and Gas Offshore Pipelines in Indonesia: A Risk-Based Analysis Approach for Developing Inspection Strategy Policy. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 45(1), 458–470. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i1.397
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

M. Bharata Purnama Putra

Department Metallurgy and Material, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia

Johny W. Soedarsono

Department Metallurgy and Material, Faculty of Engineering, Universitas Indonesia, Depok, West Java, 16424, Indonesia

Deni Ferdian

Directorate General of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Rini Riastuti

Directorate General of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Mirza Mahendra

Directorate General of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

Joko Hadi Wibowo

Directorate General of Oil and Gas, Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources, DKI Jakarta, Indonesia

References

Website Kementerian Energi Dan Sumber Daya Mineral Direktorat Jenderal Minyak dan Gas Bumi. Available: http://migas.esdm.go.id."

Ditjen Migas, "Database Pipa Penyalur," Jakarta, 2022 [UNPUBLISHED REFERENCE].

T. Steinvoorte, "Unpiggable Pipelines," in Oil and Gas Pipelines: Integrity and Safety Handbook, 2015. doi: 10.1002/9781119019213.ch37.

T. O. Miesner and W. L. Leffler, Oil and Gas Pipelines in Nontechnical Language. Oklahoma: Pennwell, 2006.

T. Sinha and E. J. Vaughan, "Fundamentals of Risk and Insurance," J Risk Insur, vol. 61, no. 2, 1994, doi: 10.2307/253725.

M. R. U. Kawsar, S. A. Youssef, M. Faisal, A. Kumar, J. K. Seo, and J. K. Paik, "Assessment of dropped object risk on corroded subsea pipeline," Ocean Engineering, vol. 106, 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2015.06.056.

W. Kent Muhlbauer, Pipeline Risk Management Manual Ideas, Techniques, and Resources, Third Edition. Burlington: Elsevier, 2004.

Kolaei AZ, Nasrabadi M, Givenchi S. "Risk Assessment of Gas Condensates Export Pipelines by Indexing Method (Case Study: Special Economic Energy Zone of South Pars-Assaluyeh)." Journal of Sustainable Development; Vol 10, No 3 (2017).

Shan K, Shuai J, Xu K, Zheng W, "Failure Probability Assessment of Gas Transmission Pipelines Based on Historical Failure – related Data and Modification Factors" Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering. (2018) page 356-366.

NACE International, "Multiphase Flow Internal Corrosion Direct Assessment (MP-ICDA) Methodology for Pipelines," 2015.

Amer Jaragh, et al., "Successful Application of MP-ICDA to Assess and Confirm Crude Oil Pipeline Corrosion Threats in Kuwait using ILI," 51321-16271-SG NACE Conference Papers, 2021.

Floerl, O, Coutts A.D.M, "Feasibility of Using Remote-Operated Vehicles (ROVs) for Vessel Biofouling Inspections." NIWA. (2011)