A Study On Evaluations Of Doxofylline Tablets In Sr-Ds
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v44i5.4774Keywords:
Doxofylline, HPMC K100M and Chitosan, hardness, friability, thickness etcAbstract
The main objective of present research investigation is to formulate the sustained release tablet of Doxofylline using 3 2 factorial design. Doxofylline, an anti-Asthmatic agent, belongs BCS class-III agent. The SR tablets of Doxofylline were prepared employing different concentrations of HPMC K100M and Chitosan in different combinations by Direct Compression technique using 3 2 factorial design. The concentration of Polymers, HPMC K100M and Chitosan required to achieve the desired drug release was selected as independent variables, X 1 and X 2 respectively whereas, time required for 10% of drug dissolution (t 10%), 50% (t 50%), 75% (t 75%) and 90% (t 90%) were selected as dependent variables. Totally nine formulations were designed, Formulated and are evaluated for hardness, friability, thickness, % drug content, In-vitro drug release. From the Results it was concluded that all the formulation were found to be with in the Pharmacopoeial limits and the In- vitro dissolution profiles of all formulations were fitted in to different Kinetic models, the statistical parameters like intercept, slope & regression coefficient were calculated. Polynomial equations were developed for t 10% , t 50% , t 75% , t90%. Validity of developed polynomial equations were verified by designing 2 check point formulations (C 1 , C 2). According to SUPAC guidelines the formulation
Downloads
References
Jain NK. Controlled and novel drug delivery. CBS publishers and distribution. 1997; 1-25.
Mamidala R, Ramana V, Lingam M, Gannu R, Rao MY. Review article factors influencing the design and performance of oral sustained/controlled release dosage form. Int. journal of pharmaceutical science and nanotechnology. 2009; 2:583.
Cristina M, Aranzazu Z, Jose ML. Review: Critical factors in the release of drugs from sustained release hydrophilic matrices. Int Journal of Research in Ayurveda & Pharmacy. 2011; 21:1701-08.
Wise DL. Handbook of pharmaceutical controlled release technology. Marcel dekker Inc new York: 2002; 432-460.
Jamzad S, Fassihi R. Development of controlled release low dose class II drug-glipizide. Int. J. Pharm. 2006; 312:24-32.
Salsa T, Veiga F, Pina ME. Oral controlled release dosage form. I. Cellulose ether polymers in hydrophilic matrices. Drug Develop. & Ind. Pharm. 1997; 23:929-938.
Basak S, Reddy JB, Mani LK. Formulation and release behavior of sustained release ambroxol hydrochloride HPMC matrix tablet. Indian J. Pharm. Sci. 2006; 68:594-598.
Lapidus H, Lordi NG. Studies on controlled release formulations. Journal of Pharmaceutical sciences. 1968; 57:1292-1301.
Allen LV, Popvich GN, Ansel HC. Ansel’s Pharmaceutical dosage forms and drug delivery system. 8th ed. 2004; 260-263.
Herbig SM, Cardinal JR, Korsmeyer RW, Smith KL. Asymmetric membrane tablet coatings for osmotic drug delivery. J. Control. Release. 1995; 35:127-136.
Gupta S, Singh RP, Sharma R, Kalyanwat R, Lokwani P. Osmotic pumps: A review. Int. journal of comprehensive pharmacy. 2011; 6:1
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Madamshetti Sneha, Siringi Pravallika, Jahasultana Mohammed, A. Kumar Sai, Dr. K. Venkata Gopaiah, Dr G Kiran
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.