Comparative Study Of Phyllanthus Niruri, Sphaeranthus Indicus And Tridax Procumbens With Respect To Qualitative & Quantitative Estimation Of Phytochemicals

Main Article Content

Anju Vishwakarma
Dr. Kumud Shrivastava

Abstract

The creation of new therapeutics and the promotion of health are the main goals of current phytochemical research. Thus, this study compares three different plant & their parts with chloroform & ethyl acetate solvent for qualitative & quantitative determination of phytochemicals. Phyllanthus niruri (Root and aerial part), Sphaeranthus indicus (Root and Stem) and Tridax procumbens (Root and Flower) were utilized for the study. Plant material was then exposed to extraction specifically by chloroform & ethyl acetate. The phytochemical test & total flavonoid content by AlCl3 method was then determined. Results showed that Sphaeranthus indicus (Stem) extract suggested the presence of carbohydrate, flavonoid, protein & diterpene. For ethyl acetate extract almost similar results were obtained with addition of alkaloid.  The root extract of Sphaeranthus indicus showed the presence of carbohydrate & alkaloid only. The chloroform extract of the same was completely devoid of any phytochemical.  In Tridax procumbens (Flower) extract the chloroform extract noticed to have chloroform, flavonoid, proteins, diterpenes. The ethyl acetate extract of the same contain additionally sterol & tannin along with previously reported phytochemicals.  Total flavonoid content was found to be 2.72 mg/100mg in Aerial part of Phyllanthus niruri. For the stem part of Sphaeranthus indicus total flavonoids content in chloroform & ethyl acetate extract were found to be 1.30 mg/100mg & 2.87 mg/100mg respectively. From the above obtained results, it can by hypothesized that comparatively grater amount of phytoconstituents are present in aerial part of plants as compared to root. Also, it can be seen that in each & every case, the ethyl acetate extract yielded more amount of phytoconstituents as compared to chloroform. The fact that the aerial parts of plants in the current study contained the greatest concentration of phytochemicals suggests that plant extracts may have pharmacological effects so further research should be done to test its safety & efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Anju Vishwakarma, & Dr. Kumud Shrivastava. (2024). Comparative Study Of Phyllanthus Niruri, Sphaeranthus Indicus And Tridax Procumbens With Respect To Qualitative & Quantitative Estimation Of Phytochemicals. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 45(2), 1300–1306. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i2.4124
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Anju Vishwakarma

Research Scholar, Sarojini Naidu Government Girls Post Graduate (Autonomous) College, Shivaji Nagar, Bhopal (M.P.)

Dr. Kumud Shrivastava

Professor, Sarojini Naidu Government Girls Post Graduate (Autonomous) College, Shivaji Nagar, Bhopal (M.P.)

References

Akerele O. Importance of medicinal plants: WHO's programme. Importance of medicinal plants: WHO's programme.. 1992:63-77.

Rasool Hassan BA. Medicinal plants (importance and uses). Pharmaceut Anal Acta. 2012;3(10):2153-435.

Chanda S. Importance of pharmacognostic study of medicinal plants: An overview. Journal of pharmacognosy and phytochemistry. 2014;2(5):69-73.

Ghorbanpour M, Hadian J, Nikabadi S, Varma A. Importance of medicinal and aromatic plants in human life. Medicinal Plants and Environmental Challenges. 2017:1-23.

Jamshidi-Kia F, Lorigooini Z, Amini-Khoei H. Medicinal plants: Past history and future perspective. Journal of herbmed pharmacology. 2017 Dec 29;7(1):1-7.

Lee NY, Khoo WK, Adnan MA, Mahalingam TP, Fernandez AR, Jeevaratnam K. The pharmacological potential of Phyllanthus niruri. Journal of pharmacy and pharmacology. 2016 Aug;68(8):953-69.

Kaur N, Kaur B, Sirhindi G. Phytochemistry and pharmacology of Phyllanthus niruri L.: a review. Phytotherapy research. 2017 Jul;31(7):980-1004.

Dahanayake JM, Perera PK, Galappaththy P, Arawwawala M. A mini review on therapeutic potentials of Phyllanthus niruri L. Trends in Phytochemical Research. 2020 Sep 1;4(3):101-8.

Galani VJ, Patel BG, Rana DG. Sphaeranthus indicus Linn.: A phytopharmacological review. International Journal of Ayurveda Research. 2010 Oct;1(4):247.

Singh S, Semwal BC, Upadhaya PK. Pharmacognostic study of Sphaeranthus indicus Linn.: A Review. Pharmacognosy Journal. 2019;11(6).

Saraswathidevi HN, Mahesh CD, Pradeep S. A Classical Review on Mundi (Sphaeranthus Indicus Linn.). Journal of Ayurveda and Integrated Medical Sciences. 2019 Aug 31;4(04):300-10.

Dattaray D. Traditional Uses and Pharmacology of Plant Tridax procumbens: A Review. Sys Rev Pharm. 2022 May 1;13(5):511-7.

Mundada S, Shivhare R. Pharmacology of Tridax procumbens a weed. Int J Pharm Tech Res. 2010 Apr;2(2):1391-4.

Pandey A, Tripathi S. A Review on Pharmacognosy, Pre-phytochemistry and Pharmacological analysis of Tridax procumbens. PharmaTutor. 2014 Apr 1;2(4):78-86.

Trusheva B, Trunkova D, Bankova V. Different extraction methods of biologically active components from propolis: a preliminary study. Chemistry Central Journal. 2007 Dec;1:1-4.

Kokate CK. Ed. Practical pharmacognosy, 4th Edn., Vallabh Prakashan: 1994; 112:120.

Mukherjee PK. Quality control of herbal drugs, 2nd Edition, Business Horizons, 2007; 2-14.

Shaikh JR, Patil M. Qualitative tests for preliminary phytochemical screening: An overview. International Journal of Chemical Studies. 2020 Mar;8(2):603-8.

Geeta Parkhe, Deepak Bharti. Phytochemical investigation and determination of total phenols and flavonoid concentration in leaves extract of Vitex trifolia Linn. Journal of Drug Delivery & Therapeutics. 2019; 9(4):705-707