Evolving Land Ownership and Economic Paradigms in Ancient India: From Vedic Age to Post-Gupta Period

Main Article Content

Jasmer Singh
Tabish Hashmi

Abstract

Ancient Indian land gifts and the idea of land ownership are the focus of this research article. During this time, there were major shifts and developments in the theoretical understanding of land ownership and the land grant. Private land ownership with alienation rights in Ancient India was primarily possessed by the priestly elite and was gained via land grants. Private land ownership evolved into a critical social institution throughout time. Not all landholding classes, however, were affected by this. Other types of assignees were tightly supervised by the rulers. It was possible to seize and transfer their land. From the latter half of the Gupta era until the rise of the Delhi Sultanate, land and the ownership rights to it were fundamental to all spheres of society, including religion, politics, economics, and culture. A combination of factors, including the period's economic crisis and the fact that land served as a medium of social mobilisation and social position, led to the state granting land to officers, religious groups, and establishments in return for services. Society became more complex and stratified. The amount and variety of primary and secondary sources used for this article are enormous. An essential feature that influenced the country's social, political, religious, and economic history has been illuminated via a monograph that draws on epigraphs, inscriptions, coins, cowries, and manuscripts.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Jasmer Singh, & Tabish Hashmi. (2022). Evolving Land Ownership and Economic Paradigms in Ancient India: From Vedic Age to Post-Gupta Period. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(1), 397–404. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v43i1.3567
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Jasmer Singh

Department of History, LPU, Punjab, India

Tabish Hashmi

Department of History, LPU, Punjab, India

References

Sharma, R. S. (1976). “Forms of Property in the Early Portions of the Rig Veda".Essays in Honor of Professor S.C. Sarkar, New Delhi.

Saraswati, S. P. (1988). “The Critical and Cultural Study of the Shatapatha Barhamanas” Delhi, pp.43- 48

Morris, D. and Burton Stein. (1963). "The Economic History of India” A Bibliographic Essay”, Journal of Economic History, xxi

Jha, Ganganath. (1987) “Manu smriti with the Mahabhasya of Medhatithi”. 2nd edition. New Age International Publishers: Delhi.

Ganguli, B. N. (1963). “Readings in Indian Economic History”, 5th edition.Ranjeet Printers and Publishers: Delhi

Buhle, G. (1953). “Sacred Book of the East”, Vol. X, pp 312-325

Hopkins, E. W. (1901) “India Old and New” . New York, pp. 206-229.

Griffith. T.R. H. (1896). tr. Rigveda, . Vols VII. 49.2, X.33.6, III 31.15.

Sharma, R. S. (1968). “Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India”. 2nd Edition. Motilal Banarsidas: Delhi.

Chakravarti, R. (2016). “Exploring early India” Primus Books, New Delhi.

Aiyengar, K. V. R (1935). “Some aspects of Ancient Indian Polity” 2nd edition.University of Madras: Madras

Mishra, S. C (1996). “An inscriptional approach to the study of Arthashastra of Kauthilya” Ph.D. Thesis, Delhi University, Delhi. p.223.

Ghoshal, U. N. (2021). “A history of Indian political ideas” 6th edition. Life Span Publisher, Delhi.

Altekar, A. S (2001). “State and Govt in Ancient India”. 2nd edition. Motilal Banarsidas, Delhi.

Jones, Ken. (1981) “Buddhism and social action” Buddhist Publication Society, Colombo, Srilanka.

Milinda Panho. Trans. T.W. Rhys David. Sacred Book East. XXXV. XXXVI. p.213, 147 17. Habib Irfan, and Vivekanand Jha. (2013) “Mauryan India”. Tulika Book Publisher: New Delhi.

Salomon, R. (1998) “Indian Epigraphy.” Oxford: London.

Kalelkar, N. G .(1933) . "Distribution of Wealth in Ancient India", Proceedings of the All-India Oriental Conference, 7th Session, Allahabad.

Thapar, R. (1978) 'Social mobility in ancient India with special reference to elite groups', in idem, Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations”, Sage. p. 133.

Sharma, R. S. (1980). Indian Feudalism. Motilal Banarsidass: Delhi

Chattopadhyaya, B. D. (1990). “Aspects of Rural Settlements and Rural Society in Early Medieval India . K.P. Bagchi & Co : Calcutta

Sahu, B. P. (1997). “Introduction. In Land System and Rural Society in Early India”. Delhi : Manohar

Sharma, R. S. (1958). “The origin of feudalism in India” Journal of the Economic and Social History of the Orient, Vol. 1, No. 3, pp.297-328

Majumdar, R. C. and A.D Pusalkar (1951). “History and culture of the Indian People” Oxford: Bombay

Sharma, R. S. (1989). “Rethinking India’s Past, 206-236, Oxford University Press: Delhi

Kulke, Hermann. (1982). Fragmentation and Segmentation versus Integration? Reflections on the Concept of Indian Feudalism and the Segmentary State in Indian History. Studies in History” 4(2) JSTOR: pp.237-263

Nandi, R. N. (2002). “Agrarian Growth and Social Conflicts in Early India”.Pustak Mahal, Delhi

Majumdar, R. C and A.S, Altekar. (1954). “Vakataka and Gupta Age” Motilal Banarsidas: Delhi

Nandi, R. N. (2003). “The Feudal Order: State, Society and Ideology in Early Medieval India” Manohar: Delhi

Corpus Inscriptionum Indicarum.. Ed. J. F. Fleet, 1888, Vol. III: Calcutta

Thakur, V. K. (2003). “Urbanization in Ancient India” Abhinav Publication: Delhi.

Kulke, Hermann. 1982. Fragmentation and Segmentation versus Integration?: Reflections on the

Concept of Indian Feudalism and the Segmentary State in Indian History. Studies in History, 4(2): 237-263

Chattopadhyaya, B. D. 1990. Aspects of Rural Settlements and Rural Society in Early Medieval India.

Calcutta:

K.P. Bagchi & Co.

Nandi, R. N. 2002. Agrarian Growth and Social Conflicts in Early India, in The Feudal Order: State, Society and Ideology in Early Medieval India, ed. D.N. Jha, 303-344. New Delhi: Manohar

Sharma, R. S. 1980. Indian Feudalism. New Delhi: Motilal Banarsidass

Sahu, B. P. ed. 1997. Introduction. In Land System and Rural Society in Early India. New Delhi: Manohar

Sharma, R. S. 2009. How Feudal was Indian Feudalism?, in R. S. Sharma. Rethinking India’s Past, 206-

, Delhi: Oxford University Press

Yadava, B. N. S. 2002. The Problem of the Emergence of Feudal Relations in Early India, in The Feudal Order: State, Society and Ideology in Early Medieval India, ed. D.N. Jha, 249301. New Delhi: Manoha

Yadava, B. N. S. 2002. The Problem of the Emergence of Feudal Relations in Early India, in The Feudal

Order: State, Society and Ideology in Early Medieval India, ed. D. N. Jha. New Delhi: Manohar,

Krishnan, K. G. 2002. Uttankita Sanskrit Vidya Aranya Epigraphs, Vol.III. Mysore: Uttankita Vidya Aranya Trust, 414-416

Chattopadhyaya, B. D. 1990. Aspects of Rural Settlements and Rural Society in Early Medieval India. Calcutta:

K.P. Bagchi & Co. Chattopadhyaya, B. D. 1994. The Making of Early Medieval India. Delhi: Oxford University Press. Dayal, Suchi. 2005. Brahmana Settlements in a Famine Zone: A Case-study of the Shorapur Doab in the Early Medieval Period. Man and Environment, XXX(2): 83-89. Kulke, Hermann. 1982. Fragmentation and Segmentation versus Integration?: Reflections on the

Concept of Indian Feudalism and the Segmentary State in Indian History. Studies in History, 4(2): 237-263

H. Wilberforce-Bell, History of Kathiawad: From the Earliest Times, New Delhi, 1980, p. 29; M.R.

Majumdar, ed., Historical and Cultural Chronology of Gujarat from the Earliest Times to the

End of the Rāshtraku ta-Pratīhāra Period, Baroda, 1960, pp. 30-126

Majumdar, Historical and Cultural Chronology, p. 131

Romila Thapar, 'Social mobility in ancient India with special reference to elite groups', in idem, Ancient Indian Social History: Some Interpretations, New Delhi, 1978, p. 133

Arthasastra. of Kautilya. 1997,reprints. Tr. R.P. Kangle. 3 vols., III.8.17.9.II.35

Manusmriti with the Mahabhasya of Medhatithi.1999. Reprint, ed. Ganganatha Jha,IX. 44-45, 49-53 50. Gautama Dharmasutra, 1986. Tr. G. Buhler, Sacred Book East. XIV. XII. 37-39; VasishtaDharmasutra, 1991. Tr.

G. Buhler, Sacred Book East. XIV. XVII. 16-18.

Milinda Panho. 1993. reprints. tr. T.W. Rhys David. Sacred Book East. XXXV. XXXVI. p.213, 147

Mahavastu. ed. F.M. Muller, tr. J. Legge, S.Beal. Sacred Book East. .XVI. XVIII. XIX. I. 271-282.

- Gautama Dharmasutra, 1986. Tr. G. Buhler, Sacred Book East. XIV. XII. 37-39; VasishtaDharmasutra, 1991. Tr. G. Buhler, Sacred Book East. XIV. XVII. 16-18. 58 Gautama Dharmasutra, 1986. Tr. G. Buhler. Sacred Book East.

XXVIII. 4-17; Baudhayana Dharmasutra, 1991. Tr. G. Buhler, Sacred Book East. XIVII. 2.32; VasishtaDharmasutra, 1991. Tr. G. Buhler, Sacred Book East. XIVXVIII. 42. 59 Arthasastra. of Kautilya. 1997,reprints. Tr. R.P. Kangle. 3 vols., III.8.17.9.II.35 60 Ibid. II.24, 35. 61 Ibid. III. 1,5,6,8,9,10,15,16,17. 62 Manusmriti with the Mahabhasya of Medhatithi.1999. Reprint, ed. Ganganatha Jha,IX. 44-45, 49-5

R. S. Vaidyanath Ayyar studied the agrarian and commercial problems on the basis of Manu (Manu's

Land and Trade Laws, Madras, 1927). In I926 Balkrishna wrote his article: "Interest and Usury", Sir Asutosh Memorial, Patna

R. S. Sharma, Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India (Second Edn., Delhi, 1968), ch. I; Romila Thapar, "Interpretations of Ancient Indian Histo ry", History and Theory, vii, no. 3 (196

R. S. Sharma, Aspects of Political Ideas and Institutions in Ancient India (Second Edn., Delhi, 1968), ch. I; Romila Thapar, "Interpretations of Ancient Indian Histo ry", History and Theory, vii, no. 3 (1968), 32

en in K. M. Saran's Labour in Ancient India (Bombay, 1

H. N. Pathak, "Some Economic Concepts in Kauti lya's Arthafdstra", Proceedings of the All-India Oriental Conference, 7th Session, (1 9531, 401-o8