The Effects Of Urbanization On Local Wildlife Populations
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v46i2.5330Keywords:
Urbanization, Wildlife populations, Habitat fragmentation, Urban ecology, Conservation planning.Abstract
Rapid urbanization is one of the most pervasive forms of land-use change worldwide, profoundly reshaping ecological processes and wildlife populations. While numerous empirical studies document biodiversity declines in urban environments, existing research remains fragmented, often focusing on isolated variables or single taxa, with limited integration of underlying mechanisms. This study develops a comprehensive conceptual framework to explain how urbanization influences local wildlife populations through interacting ecological, behavioral, and spatial pathways. Drawing on principles from landscape ecology, disturbance ecology, and socio-ecological systems theory, the framework conceptualizes urbanization as a multidimensional process encompassing physical habitat transformation, human activity intensity, sensory pollution, and resource redistribution. The study identifies key mechanistic pathways, including habitat fragmentation, altered species interactions, behavioral modification, and trophic restructuring, that collectively drive population-level responses. The framework highlights the importance of nonlinear dynamics, threshold effects, and species-specific traits such as behavioral flexibility and ecological specialization in determining urban tolerance. To advance empirical research, the study formulates a set of testable propositions linking urban intensity to changes in wildlife abundance, community composition, and functional diversity. Beyond theoretical contributions, the framework offers practical insights for conservation planning by emphasizing the role of habitat connectivity, green infrastructure, and biodiversity-sensitive urban design. By integrating diverse mechanisms into a unified, testable model, this study provides a foundation for future empirical validation and supports evidence-based strategies aimed at promoting coexistence between urban development and wildlife in rapidly urbanizing landscapes.
Downloads
References
1. Alberti, M. (2016). Cities that think like planets: complexity, resilience, and innovation in hybrid ecosystems. University of Washington Press.
2. Alberti, M., Correa, C., Marzluff, J. M., Hendry, A. P., Palkovacs, E. P., Gotanda, K. M., ... & Zhou, Y. (2017). Global urban signatures of phenotypic change in animal and plant populations. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 114(34), 8951-8956.
3. Apfelbeck, B., Snep, R. P., Hauck, T. E., Ferguson, J., Holy, M., Jakoby, C., ... & Weisser, W. W. (2020). Designing wildlife-inclusive cities that support human-animal co-existence. Landscape and Urban Planning, 200, 103817.
4. Aronson, M. F., Lepczyk, C. A., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B., MacIvor, J. S., ... & Vargo, T. (2017). Biodiversity in the city: key challenges for urban green space management. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 15(4), 189-196.
5. Aronson, M. F., Nilon, C. H., Lepczyk, C. A., Parker, T. S., Warren, P. S., Cilliers, S. S., ... & Zipperer, W. (2016). Hierarchical filters determine community assembly of urban species pools. Ecology, 97(11), 2952-2963.
6. Bateman, P. W., & Fleming, P. A. (2012). Big city life: carnivores in urban environments. Journal of zoology, 287(1), 1-23.
7. Beninde, J., Veith, M., & Hochkirch, A. (2015). Biodiversity in cities needs space: a meta‐analysis of factors determining intra‐urban biodiversity variation. Ecology letters, 18(6), 581-592.
8. Birnie-Gauvin, K., Peiman, K. S., Gallagher, A. J., De Bruijn, R., & Cooke, S. J. (2016). Sublethal consequences of urban life for wild vertebrates. Environmental Reviews, 24(4), 416-425.
9. Cooke, R. S., Eigenbrod, F., & Bates, A. E. (2019). Projected losses of global mammal and bird ecological strategies. Nature Communications, 10(1), 2279.
10. Cortinovis, C., & Geneletti, D. (2018). Ecosystem services in urban plans: What is there, and what is still needed for better decisions. Land use policy, 70, 298-312.
11. Evans, K. L., Chamberlain, D. E., Hatchwell, B. J., Gregory, R. D., & Gaston, K. J. (2011). What makes an urban bird?. Global Change Biology, 17(1), 32-44.
12. Fletcher Jr, R. J., Didham, R. K., Banks-Leite, C., Barlow, J., Ewers, R. M., Rosindell, J., ... & Haddad, N. M. (2018). Is habitat fragmentation good for biodiversity?. Biological conservation, 226, 9-15.
13. Gaston, K. J., Visser, M. E., & Hölker, F. (2015). The biological impacts of artificial light at night: the research challenge. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 370(1667), 20140133.
14. Grimm, N. B., Pickett, S. T., Hale, R. L., & Cadenasso, M. L. (2017). Does the ecological concept of disturbance have utility in urban social–ecological–technological systems?. Ecosystem Health and Sustainability, 3(1), e01255.
15. Halfwerk, W., & Slabbekoorn, H. (2015). Pollution going multimodal: the complex impact of the human-altered sensory environment on animal perception and performance. Biology letters, 11(4), 20141051.
16. Ives, C. D., Oke, C., Hehir, A., Gordon, A., Wang, Y., & Bekessy, S. A. (2017). Capturing residents’ values for urban green space: Mapping, analysis and guidance for practice. Landscape and Urban Planning, 161, 32-43.
17. Johnson, M. T., & Munshi-South, J. (2017). Evolution of life in urban environments. Science, 358(6363), eaam8327.
18. Karvonen, A. (2014). Pathways of urban nature: diversity in the greening of the twenty-first-century city. In Now Urbanism (pp. 288-300). Routledge.
19. Lepczyk, C. A., Aronson, M. F., Evans, K. L., Goddard, M. A., Lerman, S. B., & MacIvor, J. S. (2017). Biodiversity in the city: fundamental questions for understanding the ecology of urban green spaces for biodiversity conservation. BioScience, 67(9), 799-807.
20. McDonnell, M. J., & Hahs, A. K. (2013). The future of urban biodiversity research: moving beyond the ‘low-hanging fruit’. Urban Ecosystems, 16(3), 397-409.
21. Meerow, S., & Newell, J. P. (2019). Urban resilience for whom, what, when, where, and why?. Urban geography, 40(3), 309-329.
22. Oro, D., Genovart, M., Tavecchia, G., Fowler, M. S., & Martínez‐Abraín, A. (2013). Ecological and evolutionary implications of food subsidies from humans. Ecology letters, 16(12), 1501-1514.
23. Rivkin, L. R., Santangelo, J. S., Alberti, M., Aronson, M. F., de Keyzer, C. W., Diamond, S. E., ... & Johnson, M. T. (2019). A roadmap for urban evolutionary ecology. Evolutionary applications, 12(3), 384-398.
24. Santini, L., González‐Suárez, M., Russo, D., Gonzalez‐Voyer, A., von Hardenberg, A., & Ancillotto, L. (2019). One strategy does not fit all: determinants of urban adaptation in mammals. Ecology Letters, 22(2), 365-376.
25. Seto, K. C., Güneralp, B., & Hutyra, L. R. (2012). Global forecasts of urban expansion to 2030 and direct impacts on biodiversity and carbon pools. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(40), 16083-16088.
26. Shannon, G., McKenna, M. F., Angeloni, L. M., Crooks, K. R., Fristrup, K. M., Brown, E., ... & Wittemyer, G. (2016). A synthesis of two decades of research documenting the effects of noise on wildlife. Biological Reviews, 91(4), 982-1005.
27. Shochat, E., Warren, P. S., Faeth, S. H., McIntyre, N. E., & Hope, D. (2006). From patterns to emerging processes in mechanistic urban ecology. Trends in ecology & evolution, 21(4), 186-191.
28. Sol, D., Lapiedra, O., & González-Lagos, C. (2013). Behavioural adjustments for a life in the city. Animal behaviour, 85(5), 1101-1112.
29. Tucker, M. A., Böhning-Gaese, K., Fagan, W. F., Fryxell, J. M., Van Moorter, B., Alberts, S. C., ... & Mueller, T. (2018). Moving in the Anthropocene: Global reductions in terrestrial mammalian movements. Science, 359(6374), 466-469.
30. United Nations. (2023). World urbanization prospects: The 2023 revision. United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Dr Archana Shailesh Patel
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
