Avian Ecology And Conservation Challenges In Keoladeo Bird Sanctuary, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v46i1.5111Keywords:
Diversity, Richness, Migration, Habitat, Birds, WildlifeAbstract
Keoladeo National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site located in Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India is long known for its rich avian biodiversity, including globally threatened and migratory bird species. The present study investigates the avian diversity and conservation challenges through multiple field surveys conducted during November and December 2024. A total of 3488 individuals representing 73 species across 34 families were recorded using the point-count method. Remarkably, 2176 individuals from eight globally threatened and near-threatened species were observed including two endangered species (Aquila nipalensis and Neophron percnopterus), two vulnerable species (Clanga hastata and Ciconia episcopus) and four near-threatened species. Diversity analysis revealed a Richness Index of 8.83, indicating high species richness, while Simpson’s Index (0.62) and Shannon’s Index (1.89) suggest moderate species diversity. Ciconiidae appeared to be the most dominant family, accounting for 62.1% of the total avian population, with Mycteria leucocephala being the most abundant species. Furthermore, a decline in migratory bird populations was observed compared to previous years and Eurasian spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) were found nesting outside the boundaries of park suggesting a shift in breeding habitats potentially due to habitat degradation. The study highlights habitat loss, fragmentation, water scarcity and human interference are significant threats to avian diversity. These findings also suggest an urgent need for conservation strategies including sustainable habitat management and regular ecological monitoring to preserve wildlife biodiversity.
Downloads
References
1. Ali, S., 2002. The book of Indian birds. Oxford University press.
2. Batary, P., Fronczek, S., Normann, C., Scherber, C., Tscharntke, T., 2014. How do edge effect and tree
species diversity change bird diversity and avian nest survival in Germany’s largest deciduous forest? For.
Ecol. Manag. 319, 44–50.
3. Bhatt, D., Joshi, K.K., 2011. Bird assemblages in natural and urbanized habitats along elevational gradient
in Nainital district (western Himalaya) of Uttarakhand state, India. Curr. Zool. 57, 318–329.
4. Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., Mustoe, S., 2000. Bird census techniques. Elsevier.
5. Caprio, E., Chamberlain, D.E., Isaia, M., Rolando, A., 2011. Landscape changes caused by high altitude
skipistes affect bird species richness and distribution in the Alps. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2958–2967.
6. Crosby, M., 1996. Threatened birds in the eastern Himalayas. OBC Bull. 23, 21–23.
7. Divyanshu., Kumari, C., 2025. Migratory wings over wetlands: Avian diversity at Vikramshila Gangetic
dolphin sanctuary, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1).
https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.34641
8. Jankowski, J.E., Ciecka, A.L., Meyer, N.Y., Rabenold, K.N., 2009. Beta diversity along environmental
gradients: implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology,
78: 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01487.x
9. Kissling, W.D., Field, R., Korntheuer, H., Heyder, U., Bohning-Gaese, K., 2010. Woody plants and the
prediction of climate-change impacts on bird diversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2035–204510.Margalef, R., 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3, 36–71.
11.Mathur, V.B., K. Sivakumar, Singh, B., Anoop, K.R., 2009. A bibliographical review for identifying
research gap areas: Keoladeo Ghana National Park – A World Heritage site. Wildlife Institute of India,
Dehradun. 54p.
12.Morelli, F., 2013., Relative importance of marginal vegetation (shrubs, hedgerows, isolated trees) surrogate
of HNV farmland for bird species distribution in Central Italy. Ecol. Eng. 57, 261–266.
13.Naoroji, R., 1990. Predation by (Aquila) eagles on nestling storks and herons in Keoladeo National Park,
Bharatpur. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society. 87(1):37-46.
14.Pandit, M.K., Sodhi, N.S., Koh, L.P., Bhaskar, A., Brook, B.W., 2007. Unreported yet massive deforestation
driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 153–163.
15.Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois
Press, Illinois.
16.Shekhawat, D.S., Bhatnagar, C., 2014. Guild, status, and diversity of avian fauna in the Jhunjhunu district,
Rajasthan, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 7: 262-267.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2014.06.001
17.Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0
18.Wretenberg, J., Part, T., Berg, Å., 2010. Changes in local species richness of farmland birds in relation to
landuse changes and landscape structure. Biol. Conserv. 143, 375–381.
19.Wuczynski, ´ A., Kujawa, K., Dajdok, Z., Grzesiak, W., 2011. Species richness and composition of bird
communities in various field margins of Poland. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 141, 202–209.
20.Zuria, I., Gates, J.E., 2012. Community composition, species richness, and abundance of birds in field
margins of central Mexico: local and landscape-scale effects. Agrofor. Syst. 87, 377–393.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Divyanshu, Jay Kumar Jay, Chahat Kumari

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.