Avian Ecology And Conservation Challenges In Keoladeo Bird Sanctuary, Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India

Authors

  • Divyanshu University Department of Zoology, T. M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
  • Jay Kumar Jay University Department of Zoology, T. M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India
  • Chahat Kumari University Department of Zoology, T. M. Bhagalpur University, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v46i1.5111

Keywords:

Diversity, Richness, Migration, Habitat, Birds, Wildlife

Abstract

Keoladeo National Park, a UNESCO World Heritage Site located in Bharatpur, Rajasthan, India is long known for its rich avian biodiversity, including globally threatened and migratory bird species. The present study investigates the avian diversity and conservation challenges through multiple field surveys conducted during November and December 2024. A total of 3488 individuals representing 73 species across 34 families were recorded using the point-count method. Remarkably, 2176 individuals from eight globally threatened and near-threatened species were observed including two endangered species (Aquila nipalensis and Neophron percnopterus), two vulnerable species (Clanga hastata and Ciconia episcopus) and four near-threatened species. Diversity analysis revealed a Richness Index of 8.83, indicating high species richness, while Simpson’s Index (0.62) and Shannon’s Index (1.89) suggest moderate species diversity. Ciconiidae appeared to be the most dominant family, accounting for 62.1% of the total avian population, with Mycteria leucocephala being the most abundant species. Furthermore, a decline in migratory bird populations was observed compared to previous years and Eurasian spoonbills (Platalea leucorodia) were found nesting outside the boundaries of park suggesting a shift in breeding habitats potentially due to habitat degradation. The study highlights habitat loss, fragmentation, water scarcity and human interference are significant threats to avian diversity. These findings also suggest an urgent need for conservation strategies including sustainable habitat management and regular ecological monitoring to preserve wildlife biodiversity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ali, S., 2002. The book of Indian birds. Oxford University press.

2. Batary, P., Fronczek, S., Normann, C., Scherber, C., Tscharntke, T., 2014. How do edge effect and tree

species diversity change bird diversity and avian nest survival in Germany’s largest deciduous forest? For.

Ecol. Manag. 319, 44–50.

3. Bhatt, D., Joshi, K.K., 2011. Bird assemblages in natural and urbanized habitats along elevational gradient

in Nainital district (western Himalaya) of Uttarakhand state, India. Curr. Zool. 57, 318–329.

4. Bibby, C.J., Burgess, N.D., Hill, D.A., Mustoe, S., 2000. Bird census techniques. Elsevier.

5. Caprio, E., Chamberlain, D.E., Isaia, M., Rolando, A., 2011. Landscape changes caused by high altitude

skipistes affect bird species richness and distribution in the Alps. Biol. Conserv. 144, 2958–2967.

6. Crosby, M., 1996. Threatened birds in the eastern Himalayas. OBC Bull. 23, 21–23.

7. Divyanshu., Kumari, C., 2025. Migratory wings over wetlands: Avian diversity at Vikramshila Gangetic

dolphin sanctuary, Bhagalpur, Bihar, India. International Journal for Multidisciplinary Research, 7(1).

https://doi.org/10.36948/ijfmr.2025.v07i01.34641

8. Jankowski, J.E., Ciecka, A.L., Meyer, N.Y., Rabenold, K.N., 2009. Beta diversity along environmental

gradients: implications of habitat specialization in tropical montane landscapes. Journal of Animal Ecology,

78: 315-327. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01487.x

9. Kissling, W.D., Field, R., Korntheuer, H., Heyder, U., Bohning-Gaese, K., 2010. Woody plants and the

prediction of climate-change impacts on bird diversity. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 365, 2035–204510.Margalef, R., 1958. Information theory in ecology. Gen. Syst. 3, 36–71.

11.Mathur, V.B., K. Sivakumar, Singh, B., Anoop, K.R., 2009. A bibliographical review for identifying

research gap areas: Keoladeo Ghana National Park – A World Heritage site. Wildlife Institute of India,

Dehradun. 54p.

12.Morelli, F., 2013., Relative importance of marginal vegetation (shrubs, hedgerows, isolated trees) surrogate

of HNV farmland for bird species distribution in Central Italy. Ecol. Eng. 57, 261–266.

13.Naoroji, R., 1990. Predation by (Aquila) eagles on nestling storks and herons in Keoladeo National Park,

Bharatpur. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society. 87(1):37-46.

14.Pandit, M.K., Sodhi, N.S., Koh, L.P., Bhaskar, A., Brook, B.W., 2007. Unreported yet massive deforestation

driving loss of endemic biodiversity in Indian Himalaya. Biodivers. Conserv. 16, 153–163.

15.Shannon, C.E., Weaver, W., 1963. The mathematical theory of communication. The University of Illinois

Press, Illinois.

16.Shekhawat, D.S., Bhatnagar, C., 2014. Guild, status, and diversity of avian fauna in the Jhunjhunu district,

Rajasthan, India. Journal of Asia-Pacific Biodiversity 7: 262-267.

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.japb.2014.06.001

17.Simpson, E.H., 1949. Measurement of diversity. Nature 163: 688. https://doi.org/10.1038/163688a0

18.Wretenberg, J., Part, T., Berg, Å., 2010. Changes in local species richness of farmland birds in relation to

landuse changes and landscape structure. Biol. Conserv. 143, 375–381.

19.Wuczynski, ´ A., Kujawa, K., Dajdok, Z., Grzesiak, W., 2011. Species richness and composition of bird

communities in various field margins of Poland. Agric., Ecosyst. Environ. 141, 202–209.

20.Zuria, I., Gates, J.E., 2012. Community composition, species richness, and abundance of birds in field

margins of central Mexico: local and landscape-scale effects. Agrofor. Syst. 87, 377–393.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-01

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.