Comparative Study Of Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (Grasp) Vs Task Specific Training (Tst) On Upper Limb Function In Subacute Stroke Survivors

Main Article Content

Sherin Paul B
Prof (Dr.) R. K. Sharma
Dr. Chhavi Kalra
Dr. Ankita Sharma

Abstract

Study Design: Comparative study Design Methods.


Aim and Objectives: The aim of the study was to find out the comparison between GRASP and TST on Upper Extremity functions of subacute stroke survivors


Participants: 30 subjects were chosen based on inclusion and exclusion criteria by using convenient sampling method. They were divided into 3 groups of 10 each for respective groups.


Methods: Fugl Mayer Assessment (FMA) was administrated to all the subjects to evaluate the pre-test value. Each group received their respective intervention for 8 weeks, 5 sessions per week. After the intervention, the post-test was conducted for all the three groups by the administration of Fugl Mayer Assessment (FMA). Graph pad InStat was used to analyze the data.


Result: Statistical analysis shows that there was a significant difference on Upper Extremity Functions of persons with subacute stroke in both Experimental groups (A) and (B) as well as Control group (C). comparing mean obtained on posttest in the experimental groups (A, B) and control group (C) using, Fugl Mayer Assessment (FMA) 43.1, 42.4 and 37.3 respectively; it is seen that mean obtained in GRASP is higher than the TST and the least are obtained in Conventional OT on Fugl Mayer Assessment (FMA). Conclusion: This study concludes that Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (GRASP) and Task Specific Training (TST) combined with Conventional Occupational Therapy improve Upper Extremity Functions of persons with subacute stroke.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Sherin Paul B, Prof (Dr.) R. K. Sharma, Dr. Chhavi Kalra, & Dr. Ankita Sharma. (2023). Comparative Study Of Graded Repetitive Arm Supplementary Program (Grasp) Vs Task Specific Training (Tst) On Upper Limb Function In Subacute Stroke Survivors. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44(3), 1723–1727. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v44i3.4801
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Sherin Paul B

Student, MOT (Neurology} Santosh Occupational Therapy College Ghaziabad 

Prof (Dr.) R. K. Sharma

Dean, Paramedical, Principal Santosh Occupational Therapy College Ghaziabad 

Dr. Chhavi Kalra

Assistant Professor (Neurology), MOT (Neurology), Santosh Occupational therapy College,

Dr. Ankita Sharma

Assistant Professor (Neurology)¸ MOT (Neurology), Santosh Occupational therapy College,

References

Guidelines for prevention and management of stroke; Directorate general health service ministry of health and family welfare, Government of India, 2019

G. Nelles, W. Jentzen et.al, Arm Training Induced Brain Plasticity in Stroke Studied with Serial.Positron.Emission Tomography, NeuroImage 13, 1146–1154 (2001) doi:10.1006/nimg.2001.0757

Kamal Narayan Arya et.al, Meaningful Task-Specific Training (MTST) for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial, Top Stroke Rehabilitation,2012;19(3):193–211 doi: 10.1310/tsr1903-193

Judi Edmans, Occupational therapy and stroke; 2nd edition,2010; ISBN 978-1-4051-9266-8

Ole Morten Rønning; Bjørn Guldvog, Outcome of Subacute Stroke Rehabilitation: A Randomized Controlled Trial, 1998; 29: 779-784.

Kathryn S Hayward and Sandra G Brauer, Dose of arm activity training during acute and sub-acute rehabilitation post stroke: systematic review of the literature, Clinical rehabilitation 2015; vol 29(12): 1234-1243

John bamford , peter sandercock et al ,Classification and natural history of clinically identifiable subtypes of cerebral infarction, 1991;337;1521-26. 17.

Heart and Stroke Foundation , Canadian Partnership for Stroke Recovery; 2022 stroke engine team.

National Stroke Network, upper limb assessment and treatment guides; task specific training; 2017

Robert teasel, narhayati Hussein et al, Evidence Based Review of Stroke rehabilitation, clinician handbook, hemiplegic upper extremity rehabilitation; 2020; chapter (4)

Evidence Based Review of Stroke rehabilitation, clinician handbook, elements of stroke rehabilitation; 2020: chapter (6)

Mary Vining Radomski Catherine A. TromblyLatham, Occupational Therapy for Physical Dysfunction, 7th edition; 2014, ISBN 978-1-4511-2746-1.

Aho, K., Harmsen, P., Hatano, S., Marquardsen, J., Smimov, V.E. et al. Cerebrovascular disease in the community: Results of a collaborative study, 1980; Bull. WHO, 58, 113-30

Simon.B.N.Thomsonand Marynanne morgan, Occupational.therapy.for.stroke.rehabilitation; 1990

P.Michel et.al, Introduction to.Stroke.and.Its.Management; Cerebrovascular.Diseases, 2003; 15(suppl2):1–10,DOI: 10.1159/000069674

Diji Kuriakose and Zhicheng Xiao, Pathophysiologyand Treatment of Stroke: Present Status and Future Perspectives, International Journal Of Molecular Science, 2020

Hatem SM, Saussez G, della FailleM, Prist V,ZhangX, Dispa Dand Bleyenheuft Y, Rehabilitation of Motor Function after Stroke: A Multiple Systematic Review Focused on Techniques to Stimulate Upper Extremity Recovery. (2016) Front. Hum. Neurosci. 10:442. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00442

Joel stein, Richard L. Harvey; Demosmedical, Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation; 2009, ISBN-13:978-1-933864-12-9

Janet H Carr, Roberta B Shepherd; Stroke Rehabilitation Guidelines for Exercise and Training to Optimize Motor Skill; 2003; ISBN 0 7506 4712 4

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>