Lost In Conformity: Exploring The Erosion Of Identity And Individuality In The Face Of Oppression In Authoritarian Dystopias

Main Article Content

Swati Mittal
Dr. Shivani Vashist
Dr. Kajal Chaudhary

Abstract

Dystopia is a place where everything is disastrously wrong. Dystopian literature embodies recurring elements that construct a vivid and often unsettling description of oppressive societies. Dystopian literature explores fictitious societies or worlds characterised by oppressive governance and dehumanisation. Several works of dystopian literature centre around the concept of totalitarianism, offering readers an opportunity to critique this system and emphasise the significance of individuality and freedom that is suppressed under the rule of totalitarianism. This research paper delves into the convoluted realms of dystopian literature, focusing on the pervasive composition of the loss of identity and individuality in the face of oppressive regimes. Employing a qualitative research methodology, the study centres its analysis on Margaret Atwood's seminal work, The Handmaid's Tale, to unravel the profound impacts of authoritarian control on the characters' sense of self.


The investigation extends by examining the plight of women in dystopian settings, illuminating the multifaceted practices in which they grapple with the erasure of their individual identities. Through a careful examination of the characters' experiences, the paper aims to shed light on the nuanced nature of gender-based oppression, presenting how women become symbolic of a broader societal scrabble against totalitarian rule. By investigating the inimical consequences of technological advancements, the study emphasises the erosion of personal freedoms and the subjugation of autonomy that often accompanies the omnipresence of advanced surveillance and control mechanisms.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Swati Mittal, Dr. Shivani Vashist, & Dr. Kajal Chaudhary. (2024). Lost In Conformity: Exploring The Erosion Of Identity And Individuality In The Face Of Oppression In Authoritarian Dystopias. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 45(3), 538–546. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i3.4249
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Swati Mittal

Research Assistant, Department of English, School of Media Studies and Humanities, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad.

Dr. Shivani Vashist

Director, School of Media Studies and Humanities, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad.

Dr. Kajal Chaudhary

Assistant Professor, Department of English, School of Media Studies and Humanities, Manav Rachna International Institute of Research and Studies, Faridabad.

References

Abrams, M. H., and Geoffrey Galt Harpham. A Glossary of Literary Terms. 6th ed. New Delhi: Wadsworth Cengage Learning, 2011. Print.

Atwood, Margaret. The Handmaid’s Tale. A Fawcett Crest Book, 1985. Print.

Arendt, Hannah. Origins of Totalitarianism. New York: Harcourt Brace & Company, 1948. Print.

Bernays, Edward. Propaganda. New York: Horace Liveright, 1928. Print.

Bernays, Edward. Public Relations. Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, 1952. Print.

Bernays, Edward. The Engineering of Consent. Norman Oklahoma: University of Oklahoma, 1955. Print.

Coad, David. "Hymens, lips and masks: The veil in Margaret Atwood's The Handmaid's Tale." Literature and Psychology 47.1/2 (2001): 54.

Claeys, Gregory. The Origins of Dystopia: Wells, Huxley and Orwell.˝ The Cambridge Companion to Utopian Literature. Ed. Gregory Claeys. New York: Cambridge University Press, 2010. 107-135. Google Books. Web. 23 May 2014.

Chin-Yi, Chung. Feminist Dystopia in the Handmaid'S Tale. www.academia.edu/13917875/Feminist_dystopia_in_The_Handmaids_Tale.

Dubs, Joe. “Propaganda: Mind Manipulation and Manufacturing Consent.” Wake Up World, N.p., 14 Oct. 2014. Web. 16 Nov. 2016.

Foucault, Michel. The Archaeology of Knowledge. Trans. Alan Sheridan Smith. New York: Pantheon Books, 1972. Print.

Foucault, Michel. Discipline and Punish: The Birth of the Prison. Trans. Alan Sheridan Smith. New York: Vintage Books, 1977. Print.

Ferns, Chris. "The Value/s of Dystopia: The Handmaid's Tale and the Anti-Utopian Tradition." The Dalhousie Review (1989).

Ferris, Harley. “Are We There Yet? A Study in Dystopian Fiction.” Journal of Research across the Disciplines I (2008): 2-31. Web. 20 May 2014. < http://www.ju.edu/jrad/documents/ferris-dystopian_fiction_final.pdf>.

Gordin, Michael D., Tilley, Helen, and Prakash, Gyan. ˝Introduction.˝ Utopia/Dystopia: Conditions of Historical Possibility. By Gordin, Tilley, and Prakash. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2010. 1-6. Google Books. Web. 16 April 2014.

Gottlieb, Erika. Dystopian Fiction East and West: Universe of Terror and Trial. Kingston: McGill-Queen” s University Press, 2001. Google Books. Web. 9 April 2014.

Hammer Barbé, Stephanie. “The World As It Will Be? Female Satire and the Technology of Power in The Handmaid’s Tale”. Modern Language Studies 20:2 (1990): 39-49.Web.

Huxley, Aldous. Brave New World. Vintage, 2010.

Halsall, Alison J. Manipulating the Dystopia: Margaret Atwood’s Deliberative and Epideictic Rhetoric in the Handmaid’s Tale. 1 Jan. 1999, www.academia.edu/27111221/Manipulating_the_Dystopia_Margaret_Atwood_s_Deliberative_and_Epideictic_Rhetoric_in_The_Handmaid_s_Tale.

Jadwin, Lisa. ˝Margaret Atwood” s The Handmaid” s Tale (1985): Cultural and Historical Context. ˝ The Handmaid’s Tale: Critical Insights. Ed. J. Brooks Bouson. Ipswich: Salem Press, 2009. 21-41. PDF.

Malak, Amin. ˝Margaret Atwood” s The Handmaid” s Tale and the Dystopian Tradition.˝ Canadian Literature 112 (1987): 9-16. Web. 20 May 2014.

Mussolini, Benito. “La Dottrina del Fascismo.” The Social and Political Doctrines of Contemporary Europe. Ed. M. Oakeshott. London: Cambridge University Press, 1939. 168-178. Print.

Neumann, Franz. The Democratic and the Autocratic State. Glencoe: The Free Press of Glencoe, 1957. Print.

Plattel, Martin G. Utopian, and Critical Thinking. Pittsburgh: Duquesne UP, 1972. Print.

Parker, Martin. “Utopia and the Organizational Imagination: Eutopia.” Utopia and Organization. Ed. Martin Parker. Malden: Blackwell Publishing, 2002. 217- 224. Print.

Riesman, David. Abundance for What? And Other Essays. London: Chatto and Windus, 1964. Print.

Stock, Adam. Mid Twentieth-Century Dystopian Fiction and Political Thought. Diss. Durham University, 2011. Web. 23 May 2014.

Sugg, Katherine. "Literary Narration, Complicity, and Political Dystopia in Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale." The Handmaid's Tale: Teaching Dystopia, Feminism, and Resistance Across Disciplines and Borders (2019): 43.

Şenel, Görkem Neşe. Deconstructing the Memory of a Dystopia: Tracing Ecofeminist Reclections Within the Handmaid’s Tale. www.academia.edu/37672628/Deconstructing_The_Memory_of_A_Dystopia_Tracing_Ecofeminist_Reclections_within_The_Handmaid_s_Tale.

Stein, F Karen. “Margaret Atwood’s The Handmaid’s Tale: Scheherazade in Dystopia”. University of Toronto Press 61:2 (1991): 269-280. Web

Tokum, Ebru. Traces of Dystopia in the Handmaid’s Tale and Never Let Me Go. www.academia.edu/15140513/Traces_of_Dystopia_in_The_Handmaid_s_Tale_and_Never_Let_Me_Go.

Varsam Maria. “Concrete Dystopia: Slavery and Its Others.” Dark Horizons: Science Fiction and the Dystopian Imagination. Ed. Raffaella Baccolini and Tom Moylan. New York: Routledge, 2003. 203-224. Print.

Weiss, Allan. “Offred” s Complicity and the Dystopian Tradition in Margaret Atwood” s The Handmaid” s Tale.” Studies in Canadian Literature / Études en littérature canadienne 34.1 (2009): n. pag. Web. 20 May 2014.

Yeo, Michael. ˝Propaganda and Surveillance in George Orwell‟s Nineteen Eighty-Four: Two Sides of the Same Coin.˝ Global Media Journal 3.2 (2010): 49-66. Web. 22 May 2014. < http://www.gmj.uottawa.ca/1002/v3i2_yeo.pdf>.