Exclusive Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy For Motor Recovery In Left Hemiplegic Patient.

Main Article Content

P. R. Suresh

Abstract

Chronic hemiplegics are a big challenge for the therapist to restore their motor skills and the patient survives with poor quality of life and dependency. The study reports a case study on the response of chronic left hemiplegic patient focusing on the role of unique modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy as an intervention that doesn’t respond to the conventional approach. The detail of how the patient progressed in the motor improvement of the paralytic upper limb is discussed. A convergent association of mCIMT& Task-oriented approach has been demonstrated as a success story for post-stroke recovery in a short period of 4 weeks and in kicking off Neuroplasticity.


 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
P. R. Suresh. (2022). Exclusive Modified Constraint-Induced Movement Therapy For Motor Recovery In Left Hemiplegic Patient. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(1), 509–514. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v43i1.4134
Section
Articles
Author Biography

P. R. Suresh

16, Sr.MIG-B, PEOPLES MEDICAL CAMPUS, BHANPU, Bhopal-462037, M.P., )9826244676, 700754972

References

Gilroy, J: Basic Neurology, ed 3. McGraw-Hill, New York, 2000.

Hachinski, V and Norris, J: The Acute Stroke. FA Davis, Philadelphia, 1985.

Curtis, S, and Porth, C: Disorders of brain function. In Porth, C (ed): Pathophysiology, ed. 5. Lippincott, Philadelphia, 1998,p 879.

Haig, A, et al: Locked-in syndrome: A review. Curr Concepts Rehabil Med 2:12, 1986.

Haig, A, et al: Mortality and complications of the locked-in syndrome. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 68:24, 1987.

Kaplan, P, Cailliet, R, and Kaplan, C: Rehabilitation of Stroke. Butterworth-Heinemann, Woburn, MA, 2003.

Bogousslavsky, J, et al: The Lausanne stroke registry: Analysis of 1,000 consecutive stroke patients. Stroke 19: 1083, 1988.

Neurological disease, pg no. 1200 (stroke)

Smith, D, et al: Proprioception and spatial neglect after stroke. Age Ageing 12:63, 1983.

Fields, H: Pain. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1987.

F. Glowlla, sharukh a. Golwalla (2008), Medicine for Students, chapter-6 Neurology, pg no. 516 (stroke)

Anil Dixit, Yatharth Dixit, Anil Mishra (2020), basics of community medicine volume 1, chapter 6 epidemiology of non-communicable disease, pg no. 265

K George Mathew, Parveen Aggarwal (2008), medicine (manual for undergraduates) chapter 5 disease of the nervous system. pg no. 245

George w. Thorn, anthony s. Fauci, eugenebraunwalddenniskasper (2008), Harrison’s Principles of Interrnal Medicine, chapter 346 Cerebrovascular Disease, pg no. 2513, pg no. 2549

Michael Swash, Michael G Lynn (2007), Hutchison’s Clinical Methods (an integrated approach to clinical practice), chapter- 10 Nervous system, pg no.- 207

Pt Mehta, Sp Mehta, Sr Joshi, August 2009, Practical Medicine, chapter- 6 central nervous system, pg no. – 288

Stanley Davidson, NicholarBoon, Nicki R. Colledge (2006), Davidson Principles &Practice of medicine, chapter 26

Twitchell, T: The restoration of motor function following hemiplegia in man. Brain 47:443, 1951.

Brunnstrom, S: Motor testing procedures in hemiplegia based on recovery stages. J Am Phys Ther Assoc 46:357, 1966.

Bobath, B: Adult Hemiplegia: Evaluation and Treatment, ed 2. Heinemann, London, 1978.

Fugl-Meyer, A, et al: The post stroke hemiplegic patient, 1. A method for evaluation of physical performance. Scand J Rehabil Med 7:13, 1976.

Gray, C, et al: Motor recovery following acute stroke. Age Ageing19:179, 1990.