A novel physiotherapeutic approach for the treatment of Os Naviculare: A case study.

Main Article Content

Amir Ateeq
Himanshu Mathur
Manivannan S.
Khushboo Jaisinghani
Ipshita Adhikary

Abstract

Background:


Os naviculare in general alters the functional and anatomical balances of the longitudinal plantar arch. A substantial number of the posterior tibialis tendon fibers insert on the accessory  ossicle instead of its insertion on tarsal and metatarsal bones resulting in unbalanced stress forces on the tendon. The presence of an accessory navicular type II or type III is a risk factor for PTT tendinopathy and possible PTT tear.


Methodology:


In this single subject case study, the participant reported with the pre-diagnosed Os naviculare. On examination at initial presentation, the navicular tuberosity of the affected foot was prominent as compared to   the contralateral limb. The site was tender on palpation.


Ankle range of motion was within normal ranges except ankle dorsiflexion was slightly compromised. Mild pain on active and resisted was noted. Functional tests like star excursion balance test, single leg standing could not be performed due to pain. Pre and post protocol assessment was graded and measured on Cumberland ankle instability tool. The tenderness was recorded using numeric pain rating scale. Star excursion balance test was performed one on 8th day and post protocol. MWM was performed at distal tibiofibular joint on 6 days every week for 3 weeks alongside the conventional regime exercises and ultrasound was applied post treatment session.


Result:


Result of this study suggested that addition of MWM of distal tibiofibular joint in the conservative exercise protocol was effective in the reduction of pain, dysfunction and improved dynamic control.


Conclusion:


The results of this study suggests that the addition of MWM of distal tibiofibular joint alongside conservative management shows appreciable effect in improving dysfunction, dynamic stability and reducing pain in individual with congenital Os naviculare.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amir Ateeq, Himanshu Mathur, Manivannan S., Khushboo Jaisinghani, & Ipshita Adhikary. (2024). A novel physiotherapeutic approach for the treatment of Os Naviculare: A case study. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 45(3), 283–287. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i3.4033
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Amir Ateeq

Physiotherapist, Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Jawahar Lal Nehru Medical College, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh, UP

Himanshu Mathur

Associate Professor, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Science, Jaipur National University, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Manivannan S.

Ph.D Research Scholar, Division of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Annamalai University, Chidambaram, Tamil Nadu

Khushboo Jaisinghani

BPT, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Science, Jaipur National University, Jaipur, Rajasthan

Ipshita Adhikary

MPT, Department of Physiotherapy, School of Allied Health Science, Jaipur National University, Jaipur, Rajasthan

References

Kiter E., Erdan N., Karatosun V., Gunall I., ‘Tibialis posterior tendon abnormalities in feet with accessory navicular bone and flatfoot’. Acta orthopaedica Scandinavia, 1999, December, vol. 70, p. 618-621 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3109/17453679908997852.

Wei Ling Stacy Ng, Tien Jin Tan, Jia Wen Kam, Kinjal Mehta, The Incidence and Anatomic Variation of Os Naviculare in a Multiethinic Asian Population, The Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery,Volume 61, Issue 3,2022,Pages 456-458,ISSN 1067 2516, DOI : https://doi.org/10.1053/j.jfas.2021.05.013.

S Nakayama, K Sugimoto, Y Takakura, Y Tanaka, R Kasanami, Percutaneous drilling of symptomatic accessory navicular in young athletesAm J Sports Med, 33 (2005), pp. 531-535.

M Coughlin, C Saltzman, R Anderson (Eds.), Sesamoid and accessory bones of the foot. Mann's Surgery of the Foot and Ankle (9th ed.), Elsevier, Amsterdam (2013), pp. 544-554.

H Kalbouneh, O Alajoulin, M Alsalem, N Humoud, J Shawaqfeh, M Alkhoujah, H AbuHassan, W Mahafza, D Badran, Incidence and anatomical variations of accessory navicular bone in patients with foot pain.Clin Anat, 30 (2017), pp. 436-444.

J. Huang, Y Zhang, X Ma, X Wang, C Zhang, L Chen,Accessory navicular bone incidence in Chinese patients: a retrospective analysis of X-rays following trauma or progressive pain onset. Surg Radiol Anat, 36 (2014), pp. 167-172.

Dunn JE, Link CL, Felson DT, Crincoli MG, Keysor JJ, McKinlay JB. Prevalence of foot and ankle conditions in a multiethnic community sample of older adults. Am J Epidemiol. 2004;159(5):491- 98.

Rothermel SD, Aydogan U, Roush EP, Lewis GS. Proximal InterphalangealArthrodesis of Lesser Toes Utilizing K-Wires Versus Expanding Implants: Comparative Biomechanical Cadaveric Study. Foot Ankle Int. 2019;40(2):231-36.

Angirasa AK, Barrett MJ, Silvester D. SmartToe® implant compared with Kirschner wire fixation for hammer digit corrective surgery: a review of 28 patients. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2012;51(6):711- 13.

Scholl A, McCarty J, Scholl D, Mar A. Smart toe® implant versus buried Kirschner wire for proximal interphalangeal joint arthrodesis: a comparative study. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2013;52(5):580-83.

Jay RM, Malay DS, Landsman AS, Jennato N, Huish J, Younger M. Dual-Component Intramedullary Implant Versus Kirschner Wire for Proximal Interphalangeal Joint Fusion: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2016; 55: 697-708.

Richman SH. Siqueira MB, McCullough KA, Berkowitz MJ. Correction of Hammertoe Deformity With Novel Intramedullary PIP Fusion Device Versus K-Wire Fixation. Foot Ankle Int. 2017; 38(2): 174-180.

An CM, Won JI. Effects of ankle joint mobilization with movement and weight bearing exercise on knee strength, ankle range of motion and gait velocity in patients with stroke: A pilot study. J Phys Ther Sci. 2016;28(2):689- 694.

David HG, Sergio RC, Catalina TV, et al. Talus mobilization-based manual therapy is effective for restoring range of motion and enhancing balance in older adults with limited ankle mobility: A randomized controlled trial. Gait & Posture. 2022;93:14-19.