Genetically Modified Crops: Resistant To Pest And Environmental Stress: A Review
Main Article Content
Abstract
Genetically modified crops (GMCs) have emerged as a revolutionary force in agriculture, offering promising solutions to address global challenges such as food security, environmental sustainability, and economic viability. The overview of genetically modified crops, encompassing their development, benefits, concerns, and future prospects. Genetically modified crops are created through the incorporation of specific genes from one organism into another to confer desirable traits, such as resistance to pests, diseases, and environmental stresses, or enhanced nutritional profiles. The development of GMCs involves advanced biotechnological techniques, including gene editing tools like CRISPR-Cas9 and traditional methods like selective breeding. The benefits of genetically modified crops are multifaceted. Improved yield and crop resilience contribute to increased food production, addressing the growing global population's nutritional needs. Resistance to pests and diseases reduces the reliance on chemical pesticides, promoting environmentally friendly and sustainable agricultural practices. Additionally, some GMCs are designed to withstand harsh environmental conditions, such as drought or soil salinity, expanding the range of cultivable land.
However, the widespread adoption of genetically modified crops has sparked debates and raised concerns. Environmentalists express apprehension about potential ecological impacts, including the unintentional spread of modified genes to wild plant populations and the development of resistance in target pests. Socioeconomic issues, such as intellectual property rights and corporate control over seeds, have also been contentious topics. To address these concerns, ongoing research focuses on refining the safety assessment protocols for genetically modified crops, implementing responsible and transparent regulatory frameworks, and conducting long-term environmental impact studies. Public awareness and engagement play a crucial role in shaping the ethical, legal, and social aspects surrounding genetically modified crops. Looking ahead, the future of genetically modified crops holds promise for addressing emerging challenges in agriculture. Continued advancements in gene editing technologies, increased understanding of plant genetics, and collaboration among scientists, policymakers, and communities can pave the way for innovative solutions. Striking a balance between harnessing the benefits of genetically modified crops and addressing ethical and environmental considerations will be paramount for realizing their full potential in global agriculture.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Achary, M.M.V., Sheri, V., Manna, M., Pandit, V., Borpukhan, B., Ram, B., Agrawal, A., Fartyal, D., Teotiya, D., Masakapalli, S.K., Agrawal, P.K. and Reddy, M.K. Over expression of improved EPSPS gene results in field level glyphosate tolerance and higher grain yield in rice. National library of medicine (2020).
Animasaun, D.A. and Lowerence, J.A. . Antisence RNA (asRNA) Technology: The concept and application in crop improvement and sustainable Agriculture. Research Square (Preprint) 2023. https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5172-2124.
Beyer, P., AI, Babili, S., Ye, X., Lucca, P., Schaub, P., Welsch, R. and Potrykus, I. Golden Rice: introducing the beta-carotene biosynthesis pathway into rice endosperm by genetic engineering to defeat vitamin A deficiency. National library of medicine:2002, MID: 11880581 DOI: 10.1093/jn/132.3.506S.
Brimner, T.A., Gallivan, G.J.and Stephenson, G.R.. Influence of herbicide-resistant canola on the environmental impact of weed management. Pest Manag Sci. (2005), 6:1 42–57.
Dale, P.J., Irwin, J.A. and Scheffler, J.A.). The experimental and commercial released of transgenic crop plant. Plant breeding, 1993, 111, 1-22.
Dill, G.M., CaJacob, C.A., Padgette, S.R. Glyphosate-resistant crops: adoption, use and future considerations. Pest Manag Sci, 2008, 64:326– 331. https://doi.org/10.1002/ps.1501
Dively G.P., Rose, R., Sears, M.K., Hellmich, R.L., Stanley-Horn, D.E., Calvin, D.D., Russo, J.M., Anderson, P.L. Efects on monarch butterfy larvae (Lepidoptera: Danaidae) after continuous exposure to Cry1Ab-expression corn during anthesis. Envn Entomol, 2004, 33:1116–1125. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225x-33.4.1116
Grifths, A.J.F., Wessler, S.R., Lewontin, R.C., Gelbart, W.M., Suzuki, D.T., Miller, J.H. Introduction to genetic analysis. 2008, 8th (ed.) FreemanWH, New York. https://www.bio.bg.ac.rs/materijali_predm.
Hill, R.A. (Conceptualizing risk assessment methodology for genetically modified organisms. Environ Biosafety Res, 2005,4 ;67–70.
Ibrahim, M.A., Griko, N., Junker, M. and Bulla, L. Bacillus thuringiensis : A genomics and proteomics perspective.Bioeng bugs; 2010,1(1): 31–50.
Kumar, K., Gambhir, G., Dass, A., Tripathi, A.K., Singh, A., Jha, A.K., Ydava, P., Choudhary, M. and Rakshit, S. Genetically modified crops: current status and future prospects. Planta; 2020, 251:91.
Nickson, T.E. Planning Environmental Risk Assessment for Genetically Modified Crops: Problem Formulation for Stress-Tolerant Crops. Plant physiology. 2008, 147(2): 494–502.
Raybould, A.). Problem formulation and hypothesis testing for environmental risk assessments of genetically modified crops. Environ Biosafety Res :2006, 5 ;119–125.
Shelton, A.M., J.Z. Zhao and R.T. Roush.. Economic, ecological, food safety, and social consequences of the deployment of Bt transgenic plants. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 2002, 47: 845-881.
Zwahlen, C., W. Nentwig, F. Bigler & A. Hillbeck. Tritrophic interactions of transgenic Bacillus thuringiensis corn, Anaphothrips obscurus (Thysanoptera: Thripidae), and the predator Orius majusculus (Heteroptera: Anthocoridae). Environ. Entomol. 2002, 29: 846-850.