Enhancing Syntactic Competency Of Engineering Students In English Using CLIL
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.17762/jaz.v45iS1.3430Keywords:
CLIL, English syntactic competence, definitions, content and Language Integrated Learning, mechanical engineering, performance-based testsAbstract
Content and Language Integrated Learning (CLIL) may be seen as a type of instruction where students can study foreign languages and specialized material concurrently, depending on the subject matter. By striking a balance between professional education and the acquisition of foreign language abilities, CLIL greatly enhances students' motivation, responsibility, and personal growth. CLIL is a type of bilingual education where students study foreign languages and subject material at the same time. Through teaching trials, the efficacy of the CLIL technique as an academic subject for second-year mechanical engineering students was examined in this study. Mechanical engineering second semester students are taken into consideration. Subject and English professors provided ideas for the "definitions" for the elements utilized in the Engineering Practice Lab, which were taken from the Professional English curriculum. Only mechanical engineering students taking English as a supplement are the topic of this study. The main research approach is educational experiments; alternative research methods include survey questionnaires that are used as pre- and post-tests at the start and finish of the study. Based on the survey questionnaire responses, a statistical assessment of the students' syntactic proficiency was conducted. The study's findings demonstrate students' interest in developing their definition-building abilities with favorable opinions on CLIL.
Downloads
References
Action Plan for Language Learning and Linguistic Diversity. 2003. [http://eur-lex.europa.eu/LexUri Serv/LexUriServ.do?uri=COM:2003:0449:FIN:EN:PDF].
Bonnet, A. Language, content and interaction: How to make CLIL classrooms work. 2012.
Coyle, D. Content and Language Integrated Learn-ing: Towards a Connected Research Agenda for CLIL Pedagogies. The International Journal of Bi-lingual Education and Bilingualism. 10(5). 2007. pp. 543–562.
Cummins, J. Bilingual Education and Special Edu-cation: Issues in Assessment and Pedagogy. San Diego. College Hill. 1984.
Dalton-Puffer, C., Smit, U. Empirical Perspectives on CLIL Classroom Discourse. Peter Lang. Frank-furt am Main. 2007.
Coyle, D., Hood, P., Marsh, D. CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. 2010.
Fruhauf, G., Coyle, D., Christ, I. (eds.) European Models of Bilingual/Immersion Education: Euro-pean Platform for Dutch Education. Den Haag. The Netherlands. 1996.
Lanqua A Quality Toolkit for Languages: Frame of Reference for Quality in Languages in Higher Edu-cation. 2013. [http://www.lanqua.eu/sites/default/ files/LanQua_frame_of_reference.pdf].
Lyster, R. Learning and Teaching Languages through Content: A counterbalanced approach. John Benjamins. Amsterdam/Philadelphia. 2007.
Marsh, D., Langé, G. (eds.) Implementing Content and Language Integrated Learning – A research-driven foundation course reader. TIE-CLIL. Milan. Jyvaskyla: University of Jyvaskyla. 1999.
Marsh, D., Marsland, B., Stenberg, K. Integrating Competencies for Working Life. VocTalk. University of Jyvaskyla & The European Platform for Dutch Education, The Hague. 2001.
Mehisto, P. CLIL counterweights: recognizing and decreasing disjuncture in CLIL. International CLIL Research Journal. 1. 2008. pp. 93–119.
Nikula, T., Marsh, D Terminological considerations regarding content and language learning. Bulletin Suisse de Linguistique Appliqueé, 67. 1998. pp. 13–18.
Wolff, D. The European Framework for CLIL Teacher Education. Synergies. 8. 2012. pp. 105– 116.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 K. Krishna Veni, M. Anand, M. Anish Alfred Vaz, S. Gomathi, K. Santhi Maheswari
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.