Comparative Evaluation of Rate of Canine Retraction, Root Parallelism, Canine Rotation and Anchorage Control between Micro-Osteoperforation and Low Level Laser Therapy : an in-vivo Study

Main Article Content

Dr. Helly Yogeshbhai Mehta
Dr. Romilkumar Shah

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate and compare the Rate of Canine Retraction, Root Parallelism, Canine Rotation and Anchorage control between Micro-Osteoperforation (MOP) and Low Level Laser Therapy (LLLT).


Material and Methods: Twenty-one Participants were selected and randomly divided into Group 1 (MOP Side) and Group 2 (LLLT Side). All participants had to undergo individual Canine Retraction. Participants underwent MOP on the one side and LLLT on the other side. Canines were individually retracted using closed coil NiTi (9 mm) springs at 150gms force. Study models were made at T0, 28th day (T1), 56th day (T2) and 84th day (T3). OPG was collected at T0 & T3. Different parameters like Amount of Canine Retraction, Canine Rotation, Anchorage Control and Root Parallelism were evaluated.


Results: Mean retraction of 4.45±0.52 mm is seen in MOP side and 4.62±0.71 mm on the LLLT side. No significant difference is found in Anchorage Control (p=0.68) and Root Parallelism (p=0.171) between both groups. Higher incidences of disto-palatal Canine Rotation are seen in MOP Group (0.36±0.57), but is statistically not significant (p=0.01).


Conclusion: There was statistically no significant difference found in rate of Canine Retraction, Root Parallelism, Anchorage Control and Canine Rotation between MOP and LLLT Groups

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Dr. Helly Yogeshbhai Mehta, & Dr. Romilkumar Shah. (2024). Comparative Evaluation of Rate of Canine Retraction, Root Parallelism, Canine Rotation and Anchorage Control between Micro-Osteoperforation and Low Level Laser Therapy : an in-vivo Study. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 45(1), 454–465. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i1.3273
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Dr. Helly Yogeshbhai Mehta

Part III Postgraduate Student, K. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital, Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India- 391760

Dr. Romilkumar Shah

Professor and PG GuideK. M. Shah Dental College and Hospital,Sumandeep Vidyapeeth Deemed to be University, Waghodia, Vadodara, Gujarat, India- 391760

References

Shingade M, Maurya R, Mishra H, Singh H, Agrawal K. Accelerated Orthodontics: A paradigm shift. Indian J Orthod Dentofac Res. 2017;3(2):64–8.

Fleming PS. Accelerated orthodontics: Getting ahead of ourselves? APOS Trends Orthod. 2020 :10(142):142–9.

Shenava S, Nayak K, Bhaskar V, Nayak A. Accelerated Orthodontics – A Review. Asnanportal.com.

Samantaray S, Sahu S, Gowd S, Srinivas B, Sahoo N, Mohanty P. Speedy orthodontics: A Review on methods of accelerating orthodontic treatment. Int J Oral Health Med Res. 2017;3(6):146–51.

Sidiqha N, Ahmed N, Suryavanshi S. Accelerated orthodontics. IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research. 2019:5(2):47–52.

Aboalnaga AA, Salah Fayed MM, El-Ashmawi NA, Soliman SA. Effect of micro-osteoperforation on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled trial. Prog Orthod. 2019;20(1):21.

Taddei SR de A, Andrade I Jr, Queiroz-Junior CM, Garlet TP, Garlet GP, Cunha F de Q, et al. Role of CCR2 in orthodontic tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2012;141(2):153–60.

Gulduren K, Tumer H, Oz U. Effects of micro-osteoperforations on intraoral miniscrew anchored maxillary molar distalization : A randomized clinical trial: A randomized clinical trial. J Orofac Orthop. 2020;81(2):126–41.

Orthodontic Practice US - May/June 2013 - vol 4 no 3 56-7. Issuu. 2013.

Alikhani M, Raptis M, Zoldan B, Sangsuwon C, Lee YB, Alyami B, et al. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of tooth movement. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013;144(5):639–48.

Researchgate.net. Available from: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/331105785_MicroOsteoperforations

Shetty SK, Vincent S, Kumar M, Madhur VK. Effects of microosteoperforations on rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Sch J Dent Sci. 2021;8(7):239–42.

Carvalho-Lobato P, Garcia VJ, Kasem K, Ustrell-Torrent JM, Tallón-Walton V, Manzanares-Céspedes MC. Tooth movement in orthodontic treatment with low-level laser therapy: a systematic review of human and animal studies. Photomed Laser Surg. 2014;32(5):302–9.

Fujita S, Yamaguchi M, Utsunomiya T, Yamamoto H, Kasai K. Low-energy laser stimulates tooth movement velocity via expression of RANK and RANKL. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11(3):143–55.

Kavaliauskiene A, Smailiene D, Buskiene I, Keriene D. Pain and discomfort perception among patients undergoing orthodontic treatment: results from one month follow-up study. Stomatologija. 2012;14(4):118–25.

Li FJ, Zhang JY, Zeng XT, Guo Y. Low-level laser therapy for orthodontic pain: a systematic review. Lasers Med Sci. 2015;30(6):1789–803.

Turhani D, Scheriau M, Kapral D, Benesch T, Jonke E, Bantleon HP. Pain relief by single low-level laser irradiation in orthodontic patients undergoing fixed appliance therapy. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006;130(3):371–7.

Chintavalakorn R, Saengfai NN, Sipiyaruk K. The protocol of low-level laser therapy in orthodontic practice: A scoping review of literature. J Int Soc Prev Community Dent. 2022;12(3):267–86.

Youssef M, Ashkar S, Hamade E, Gutknecht N, Lampert F, Mir M. The effect of low-level laser therapy during orthodontic movement: a preliminary study. Lasers Med Sci. 2008;23(1):27–33.

Genc G, Kocadereli I, Tasar F, Kilinc K, El S, Sarkarati B. Effect of low-level laser therapy (LLLT) on orthodontic tooth movement. Lasers Med Sci. 2013;28(1):41–7.

Eid F, El Kenany W, El Kalza A. Effect of micro-osteoperforations on the rate of canine retraction: a split-mouth randomized controlled clinical trial. Egyptian Orthodontic Journal. 2017;52(12):55–64.

Qamruddin I, Alam MK, Mahroof V, Fida M, Khamis MF, Husein A. Effects of low-level laser irradiation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement and associated pain with self-ligating brackets. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2017;152(5):622–30.

Üretürk SE, Saraç M, Fıratlı S, Can ŞB, Güven Y, Fıratlı E. The effect of low-level laser therapy on tooth movement during canine distalization. Lasers Med Sci. 2017;32(4):757–64.

Laraway R. Accelerated Orthodontic Tooth Movement in Adult Patients by Subsequent Microosteoperforations of Maxillary Cortical Bone. 2018.

Haliloglu-Ozkan T, Arici N, Arici S. conducted a study titled “In-vivo effects of flapless osteopuncture-facilitated tooth movement in the maxilla and the mandible. 2018.

Varella AM, Revankar AV, Patil AK. Low-level laser therapy increases interleukin-1b in gingival crevicular fluid and enhances the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. 2018.

Sivarajan S, Doss JG, Papageorgiou SN, Cobourne MT, Wey MC. Mini-implant supported canine retraction with micro-osteoperforation: A split-mouth randomized clinical trial. Angle Orthod. 2019;89(2):183–9.

Kundi I. Mohammad Khursheed Alam, Sohrab Shaheed [2019] conducted a study titled “Micro-osteo perforation effects as an intervention on canine retraction.

Babanouri N, Ajami S, Salehi P. Effect of mini-screw-facilitated microosteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split mouth, randomized. 2020;29.

Sre N, Nagachandran KS, Vijayalakshmi RD. Evaluation Of Rankl And Opg Levels In Orthodontic Patients Treated With And without Micro-Osteoperforation- A Randomized Controlled Trial. 2020.

Doshi G, Mehta -., Wasundhara A. Bhad-Patil [2020] conducted a study titled “Efficacy of low-intensity laser therapy in reducing treatment time and orthodontic pain: A clinical investigation.

Zheng J, Yang K. Clinical research: low-level laser therapy in accelerating orthodontic tooth movement. BMC Oral Health. 2021;21(1):324.

Venkatachalapathy S, Natarajan R, Ramachandran UM, Rajakumar P, Rangarajan S, Patil D, et al. Effect of frequency of micro-osteoperforation on miniscrew- supported canine retraction: A single-centered, split-mouth randomized controlled trial. J Contemp Dent Pract. 2022;23(8):781–7.

Babanouri N, Ajami S, Salehi P. Effect of mini-screw-facilitated micro-osteoperforation on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement: a single-center, split-mouth, randomized, controlled trial. Progress in Orthodontics. 2020 Dec; 21(1):1-0.

Ziegler P, Ingervall B. A clinical study of maxillary canine retraction with a retraction spring and with sliding mechanics. American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopaedics. 1989 Feb 1; 95(2):99-106.

Bouwens DG, Cevidanes L, Ludlow JB, Phillips C. Comparison of mesiodistal root angulation with post treatment panoramic radiographs and cone-beam computed tomography. American journal of orthodontics and Dentofacial orthopaedics. 2011 Jan 1; 139(1):126-32

Abdelhameed AN, Refai WMM. Evaluation of the effect of combined low energy laser application and micro-osteoperforations versus the effect of application of each technique separately on the rate of orthodontic tooth movement. Open Access Maced J Med Sci. 2018;6(11):2180–5.

Bajaj I, Garg AK, Gupta DK, Singla L. Comparative effect of micro-osteoperforation and Photo-biomodulation on the rate of maxillary canine retraction: A split mouth randomized clinical trial. Clin Ter. 2022;173(1):39–45.