Beyond Geometry: Examining Multi-dimensional Pedagogical Strategies in Sulba Sutras
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
This study explores the pedagogical insights inherent in the Sulba Sutras, ancient Indian mathematical texts detailing the construction of Vedic ritualistic altars. Findings reveal that the Sutras employ the equation method written in Sanskrit, emphasizing the importance of ratios, proportions, and measurements following a constructivist learning approach. Real-world objects and tools were utilized, fostering hands-on engagement and problem-solving skills. The study concludes that the Sulba Sutras offer a holistic and joyful learning experience, showcasing the immediate relevance of these pedagogical strategies of mathematics in deep geometrical understanding among students.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Amma, T. S. (1999). Geometry in ancient and medieval India. Motilal Banarsidass Publ.
Divakaran, P. P., & Divakaran, P. P. (2018). Vedic Geometry. The Mathematics of India: Concepts, Methods, Connections, 43-71.
Dutta, A. K. (2016). Was there sophisticated mathematics during the Vedic Age. An anthology of disparate technical thoughts at a popular level”(ed. A. Chaudhuri), ISIREA.
Dutta, A. K., & Sriramb, M. S. Mathematics and Astronomy in India before 300 BCE. https://www.ms.uky.edu/~sohum/ma330/files/DuttaSriramarticle.pdf
Filliozat, P. S. (2004). Ancient sanskrit mathematics: An oral tradition and a written literature. In History of science, history of text (pp. 137-157). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands. Gupta, A. (2013). Unfolding Faith: A Journey to the Kumbh. Partridge Publishing.
Glucklich, A. (2008). The strides of Vishnu: Hindu culture in historical perspective. Oxford University Press.
Jarvis, D., & Naested, I. (2012). Exploring the math and art connection: Teaching and learning between the lines. Brush Education.
Joseph, G. G. (2001). The Crest of the Peacock: Non-European Roots of Mathematics. NEXUS NETWORK JOURNAL, 3(2).
Kappraff, J. (2001). Connections: The Geometric Bridge Between Art & Science (Vol. 25). World Scientific.Khunyakari, R. (2023). Learning without Burden. Routledge.
Khunyakari, R. (2023). Learning without Burden.
Kolbe, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning. New Jersey, Eaglewood Cliffs.
Kramrisch, S. (1962). The Triple Structure of Creation in the Ṛg Veda. History of Religions, 2(1), 140-175.
Seidenberg, A. (1961). The ritual origin of geometry. Archive for history of exact sciences, 1, 488-527. Sosna, M., Trevinyo-Rodríguez, R. N., & Velamuri, S. R. (2010). Business model innovation through trial-and-error learning: The Naturhouse case. Long range planning, 43(2-3), 383-407.
White, M. D., & Marsh, E. E. (2006). Content analysis: A flexible methodology. Library trends, 55(1), 22-45.