Pragmatic Impact on the Criminal Justice Regime with Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst: A Critique

Main Article Content

Maddipati Sri Seshamamba
Prof. Ramanya Gayathri. M

Abstract

Criminal Justice Administration is in a slow process of direction due to lack of appropriate management and operation. Management and Operation of systems can be done by effective Institutional mechanism that will help in proper detective and investigative procedures coupled with fair prosecution and punishment. In this regard the vital role played by law enforcement agencies, criminal courts, Correctional agencies and NGOs or community-based programs. Thus, to serve justice it is necessary that it seems to be served by making the criminal accountable for their actions.  It requires an in-depth knowledge of legal and ethical principles as well as the ability to implement the procedural policies.  One of the key challenges in criminal justice administration is balancing the need for public safety with the protection of individual rights. This requires a careful balance between enforcing the law and respecting the rights of suspects and defendants. The use of technology especially AI, such as, electronic surveillance officers, digital forensic investigators, drone pilots, real-time crime analysts, social media researchers and accident reconstructionist, body cameras, and DNA analysis, has helped to increase transparency and accountability in the justice system, while also providing more accurate and reliable evidence. Various mechanisms used in Court Proceedings, by law firms and professionals are also playing a vital role in judicial enrichment. The improvements made in criminal justice administration with the help of Artificial Intelligence help in providing better justice for criminal cases. The Author surmises the need for reforms in criminal laws which will successfully render appreciation of evidence and acceptance of technological innovations for future administration of criminal justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Maddipati Sri Seshamamba, & Prof. Ramanya Gayathri. M. (2022). Pragmatic Impact on the Criminal Justice Regime with Artificial Intelligence as a Catalyst: A Critique. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(S1), 19–23. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v43iS1.2920
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Maddipati Sri Seshamamba

Student School of Law SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur

Prof. Ramanya Gayathri. M

Assistant Professor School of Law SASTRA Deemed to be University, Thanjavur

References

HO Hock Lai, A Philosophy of Evidence Law: Justice in the Search for Truth, Oxford, (1st Ed) 2008.

https://eservices.tnpolice.gov.in/CCTNSNICSDC/CrimeReviewTamilNadu?0

AI-based face recognition system used by various State Departments are such as ABHED (AI-Based Human Efface Detection) developed with the help of Punjab and Rajasthan Police; Odisha Police introduced AI-powered equipment to analyze crime data; TRINETRA, an AI-based face recognition app launched by Uttar Pradesh police; Andhra Pradesh introduced E-Pragati database; and AI centre set up by Delhi Police to handle crimes, in association with IIT Delhi.

Artificial Intelligence, Deep Learning, and Neural Networks Explained, Referred in https://www.innoarchitech.com/artificial-intelligence-deep-learning-neural-networks-explained/

Information Technology Act 2000.

Ninety-Fourth Report on Evidence obtained illegally or improperly proposed Section 166A, Indian Evidence Act,1872, Law Commission of India, 1983. Referred in: https://lawcommissionofindia.nic.in/51-100/Report94.pdf

Bryan A. Garner, Black’s Law Dictionary, (8th edn) 2004.

https://www.iralr.in/post/role-of-artificial-intelligence-in-legal-research

Forbes, “How AI and Machine Learning are Transforming Law Firms and the Legal Sector. “Bernard Marr, 2018.

https://www.ibm.com/in-en/topics/text-mining

LipNet: End-to-End Sentence-level Lipreading, Yannis M. Assael, Brendan Shillingford, Shimon Whiteson, Nando de Freitas, https://arxiv.org/abs/1611.01599

Selvi v. state of Karnataka, AIR 2010 SC 1974.

Eighty-Seventh Report on Identification of Prisoners Act, 1920, Law Commission of India, 1980.

Committee on Reforms of Criminal Justice System Report (Volume 1), Ministry of Home Affairs, March 2003.

Criminal Procedure (Identification) Bill, 2022

Justice K.S. Puttaswamy and Anr. Vs. Union of India and Ors, (2017) 10 SCC 1