Role Of Virtual Lab In Inculcating Scientific Attitude & Self Efficacy: Meta Analysis

Main Article Content

Swastika Sharma
Dr. Savita Gupta

Abstract

In this digitized world, the potential of technology in education is beyond our imagination as it has brought a 360-degree revolution to the education system. To achieve promising outcomes, a dire need arises to amalgamate technology with traditional methods of teaching and learning. Both academicians and researchers endorse the use of technology in pedagogy for theory as well as lab-based courses. With the constant tech invasion, it's likely that physical laboratories will lead to an obvious transition into virtual laboratories by facilitating an avant garde experience for students. It can mitigate the high costs of procurement of apparatus in traditional labs and can support distance and blended learning. Researchers have proven that virtual labs help students to save time, effort and keep abreast with the technological development in this digitized era. As per various studies, virtual laboratory enhances critical thinking, scientific attitude, science process skill, self-efficacy, and problem-solving abilities. As per various studies, virtual laboratory enhances critical thinking, scientific attitude, science process skill, self-efficacy, and problem-solving abilities. This meta-analysis is an attempt to observe the impact of virtual laboratories on the scientific attitude and self-efficacy inculcated among students across science subjects and different measurement methods. Key contributions of the study were: 1) 58% of the studies concluded that a virtual laboratory is more effective in developing scientific attitude. 2) 64% of the studies reported that virtual laboratories activities outweigh the physical laboratory activities in creating self-efficacy.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Swastika Sharma, & Dr. Savita Gupta. (2023). Role Of Virtual Lab In Inculcating Scientific Attitude & Self Efficacy: Meta Analysis. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44(S7), 588–598. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v44iS7.2864
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Swastika Sharma

Research Scholar, Lovely Professional University, Punjab 

Dr. Savita Gupta

Professor, Faculty of Education, Head Department of Faculty Development, Human Resource Development Centre, Lovely Professional University, Phagwara, Punjab

 

References

Alammary, A., Alshaikh, M., & Alhogail, A. (2022). The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the adoption of e-learning among academics in Saudi Arabia. Behaviour & Information Technology, 41(14), 3138-3160. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/0144929X.2021.1973106?needAccess=true

Aşıksoy, G., & Islek, D. (2017). The Impact of the Virtual Laboratory on Students' Attitudes in a General Physics Laboratory. International Journal of Online Engineering, 13(4).

https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/270196739.pdf

Babaie, M. (2017). Cognitive knowledge, attitude toward science, and skill development in virtual science laboratories (Doctoral dissertation, Pepperdine University).

https://www.proquest.com/openview/97b7f7b108f3a60dd99068bf742bdc5c/1?pq-origsite=gscholar&cbl=18750

Bortnik, B., Stozhko, N., Pervukhina, I., Tchernysheva, A., & Belysheva, G. (2017). Effect of virtual analytical chemistry laboratory on enhancing student research skills and practices. Research in Learning Technology, 25. https://journal.alt.ac.uk/index.php/rlt/article/view/1968

Byukusenge, C., Nsanganwimana, F., & Tarmo, A. P. (2022). Effectiveness of Virtual Laboratories in Teaching and Learning Biology: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research, 21(6), 1-17.

Chan, C., & Fok, W. (2009). Evaluating learning experiences in virtual laboratory training through student perceptions: A case study in Electrical and Electronic Engineering at the University of Hong Kong. engineering education, 4(2), 70-75.

Çivril, H., & Özkul, A. E. (2021). Investigation of the factors affecting open and distance education learners’ intentions to use a virtual laboratory. International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 22(2), 143-165.

Çivril, H. (2018). Laboratory applications in open and distance learning*

Coleman, S. K., & Smith, C. L. (2019). Evaluating the benefits of virtual training for bioscience students. Higher Education Pedagogies, 4(1), 287-299.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/23752696.2019.1599689

Comer, L. (2021). Impact of Virtual Simulation on Nursing Students’ Self-Efficacy. Available at SSRN 4002684.

Darby-White, T. T. (2016). Assessing students' learning outcomes, attitudes, and self-efficacy toward the integration of virtual laboratory in general chemistry. ProQuest LLC.

Ekawati E. Y. Istiyono E. Budiyono and Adhelacahya K. (2023). In AIP Conference Proceedings, Vol. 2540, No. 1, p. 090009.

Estoque Loñez, H., & Errabo, D. D. (2022). Students’ Self-Motivation, Self-Efficacy, Self-Regulation in Virtual Laboratory in Human Anatomy Subject. In Proceedings of the 2022 13th International Conference on E-Education, E-Business, E-Management, and E-Learning (pp. 30-34).

Faour, M. A., & Ayoubi, Z. (2018). The effect of using virtual laboratory on grade 10 students' conceptual understanding and their attitudes towards Physics. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 51(4). https://dergipark.org.tr/en/download/article-file/415803

Gambari, A. I., Falode, O. C., Fagbemi, P. O., & Idris, B. (2013). Efficacy of virtual laboratory on the achievement and attitude of secondary school students in physics practical. http://repository.futminna.edu.ng:8080/jspui/bitstream/123456789/2989/1/2013.%20Gambari%2c%20Falode%2c%20Fagbemi%2c%20Idris.%20IRCs.pdf

Ghatty, S. L. (2013). Assessing Students' Learning Outcomes, Self-Efficacy and Attitudes toward the Integration of Virtual Science Laboratory in General Physics. ProQuest LLC.

Herga, N. R., Čagran, B., & Dinevski, D. (2016). Virtual laboratory in the role of dynamic visualisation for better understanding of chemistry in primary school. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(3), 593-608.

Hussain, A., Mkpojiogu, E. O., & Ezekwudo, C. C. (2021). Improving the academic self-efficacy of students using mobile educational apps in virtual learning: A review. International Journal of Interactive Mobile Technologies, 15(6).

Husnaini, S. J., & Chen, S. (2019). Effects of guided inquiry virtual and physical laboratories on conceptual understanding, inquiry performance, scientific inquiry self-efficacy, and enjoyment. Physical Review Physics Education Research, 15(1), 010119.

Kapici, H. O., & Akcay, H. (2023). Improving student teachers’ TPACK self-efficacy through lesson planning practice in the virtual platform. Educational Studies, 49(1), 76-98.

https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03055698.2020.1835610

Keller, H. E., & Keller, E. E. (2005). Making Real Virtual Labs. Science Education Review, 4(1), 2-11.

Kennepohl, D. (2021). Laboratory activities to support online chemistry courses: A literature review. Canadian Journal of Chemistry, 99(11), 851-859.

Koehler, E. (2021). The effect of virtual labs on high school student attitudes towards chemistry.

Kolil, V. K., Muthupalani, S., & Achuthan, K. (2020). Virtual experimental platforms in chemistry laboratory education and its impact on experimental self-efficacy. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 17(1), 1-22.

https://educationaltechnologyjournal.springeropen.com/articles/10.1186/s41239-020-00204-3

Larida, A. (2021). Development and assessment of “Chem this Vlab” learning package. Journal of Science and Science Education, 5(2), 10-17.

Lev, E. L. (1997). Bandura's theory of self-efficacy: applications to oncology. Scholarly inquiry for nursing practice, 11(1), 21-37.

Lynch, T., & Ghergulescu, I. (2017). Review of virtual labs as the emerging technologies for teaching STEM subjects. INTED2017 proceedings, 6082-6091.

Makransky, G., Bonde, M. T., Wulff, J. S., Wandall, J., Hood, M., Creed, P. A., ... & Nørremølle, A. (2016). Simulation based virtual learning environment in medical genetics counseling: an example of bridging the gap between theory and practice in medical education. BMC medical education, 16, 1-9. https://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12909-016-0620-6

Mihardi, S., Derlina, Shiddiq, H. S., & Sinuraya, J. (2022). Scientific Attitudes in Scientific Online Learning Management for Student Successful Characters. Advances in Social Sciences Research Journal, 9(7), 691–697. https://doi.org/10.14738/assrj.97.12769

Musawi, A. A., Ambusaidi, A., Balushi, S. A., & Balushi, K. A. (2018). The impact of using virtual lab learning experiences on 9th grade students’ achievement and their attitudes towards science and learning by virtual lab. Journal of Turkish science education, 15(2), 13-29.

Nais, M. K., Sugiyarto, K. H., & Ikhsan, J. (2018). The profile of students’ self-efficacy using virtual chem-lab in hybrid learning. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1097, No. 1, p. 012060). IOP Publishing.

Osman, M. E. (2020). Global impact of COVID-19 on education systems: the emergency remote teaching at Sultan Qaboos University. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 463-471.

Peechapol, C. (2021). Investigating the effect of virtual laboratory simulation in chemistry on learning achievement, self-efficacy, and learning experience. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning (IJET), 16(20), 196-207. https://www.learntechlib.org/p/220540/

Peters, M., von Doetinchem, P., & de Rande, S. V. D. (2023). Virtual physics laboratory courses: An evaluation of students' self-efficacy and intelligence mindset. arXiv preprint arXiv:2301.02699.

Pratama, H., Azman, M. N. A., Kassymova, G. K., & Duisenbayeva, S. S. (2020). The Trend in using online meeting applications for learning during the period of pandemic COVID-19: A literature review. Journal of Innovation in Educational and Cultural Research, 1(2), 58-68.

Pyatt, K., & Sims, R. (2007). Learner performance and attitudes in traditional versus simulated laboratory experiences. ICT: Providing choices for learners and learning. Proceedings ascilite Singapore, 870-879.

Ramadhan M. F., & Irwanto, I. (2018). Using virtual labs to enhance students ‘thinking abilities, skills, and scientific attitudes. International Conference on Educational Research and Innovation (ICERI 2017)

Rasyida, N., Tapilouw, F. S., & Priyandoko, D. (2016). Effectiveness of development virtual laboratory for improved critical thinking and scientific attitude students’ high school on the concept of metagenesis mosses and ferns. Research Report.

Ratamun, M. M., & Osman, K. (2018). The effectiveness comparison of virtual laboratory and physical laboratory in nurturing students’ attitude towards chemistry. Creative Education, 9(09), 1411. https://www.scirp.org/html/11-6304040_86227.htm

Salame, I. I., & Makki, J. (2021). Examining the use of PhEt simulations on students’ attitudes and learning in general chemistry II. Interdisciplinary Journal of Environmental and Science Education, 17(4), e2247.

Samosa, R. C. (2021). Mobile Virtual Laboratory as Innovative Strategy to Improve Learners’ Achievement, Attitudes, and Learning Environment in Teaching Chemistry. International Journal of Multidisciplinary: Applied Business and Education Research, 2(5), 398-400.

http://ijmaberjournal.org/index.php/ijmaber/article/view/122

Santos, M. L., & Prudente, M. (2021). Effectiveness of virtual laboratories in science education: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Information and Education Technology, 11, 12.

Shadbad, F., Bahr, G., Luse, A., & Hammer, B. (2023). Best of Both Worlds: The Inclusion of Gamification in Virtual Lab Environments to Increase Educational Value.

Simbolon, R., Bunawan, W., & Juliani, R. (2022). The Effect of Virtual Laboratories on Student Learning Outcomes and Self-efficacy. In Proceedings of the 7th Annual International Seminar on Transformative Education and Educational Leadership, AISTEEL 2022, 20 September 2022, Medan, North Sumatera Province, Indonesia. https://eudl.eu/doi/10.4108/eai.20-9-2022.2324670

Solikhin, F., & Wijanarko, A. (2021). Profile of Students' Self-Efficacy in Using Chemdroid Media in Thermochemistry Learning. Journal of Educational Chemistry, 3(2), 135-142.

Sun, K. T., Lin, Y. C., & Yu, C. J. (2008). A study on learning effect among different learning styles in a Web-based lab of science for elementary school students. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1411-1422.

Tatli, Z., & Ayas, A. (2010). Virtual laboratory applications in chemistry education. Procedia-Social and behavioral sciences, 9, 938-942.

Toth, E. E. (2016). Analyzing “real-world” anomalous data after experimentation with a virtual laboratory. Educational Technology Research and Development, 64, 157-173.

Tüysüz, C. (2010). The Effect of the Virtual Laboratory on Students' Achievement and Attitude in Chemistry. International Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 2(1)..

Waldrop, M. M. (2013). The virtual lab: confronted with the explosive popularity of online learning, researchers are seeking new ways to teach the practical skills of science. Nature, 499(7458), 268-271.

Widodo, A., Maria, R. A., & Fitriani, A. (2017). Constructivist learning environment during virtual and real laboratory activities. Biosaintifika: Journal of Biology & Biology Education, 9(1), 11-18.

Yildirim, F. S. (2021). The Effect of Virtual Laboratory Applications on 8th Grade Students' Achievement in Science Lesson. Journal of Education in Science Environment and Health, 7(2), 171-181. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/jeseh/issue/68051/837243

Yu, Z. (2021). The effects of gender, educational level, and personality on online learning outcomes during the COVID-19 pandemic. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 18(1), 14.