UNDERWATER IMAGE ENHANCEMENT USING A REDUCED‑DEPTH U‑NET:

Authors

  • Pankaj Pateriya Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IPS Academy, Institute of Engineering & Science, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India
  • Vijay Choudhary Department of Computer Science and Engineering, IPS Academy, Institute of Engineering & Science, Indore, Madhya Pradesh, India

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.69980/jaz.v38i01.5450

Keywords:

underwater image enhancement, U-Net; deep learning, image-to-image translation, supervised learning, PSNR, SSIM, UIQM, Streamlit deployment

Abstract

Background: Underwater images are commonly affected by wavelength-dependent light absorption and scattering, which produce colour distortion, reduced contrast and haze-like degradation. The aim of this study was to design, implement and evaluate a supervised deep-learning system for underwater image enhancement based on a reduced-depth U-Net encoder–decoder architecture.
Methods: The network was trained end-to-end on paired underwater imagery from the EUVP (Enhancing Underwater Visual Perception) dataset, obtained through a Kaggle mirror, using an L1 reconstruction loss and the Adam optimizer, without data augmentation, batch normalization, dropout, residual connections or adversarial training. A fixed-seed 80/10/10 split produced 9,149 training, 1,143 validation and 1,143 test pairs. Performance on the held-out test split was measured with two full-reference metrics, Peak Signal-to-Noise Ratio (PSNR) and the Structural Similarity Index (SSIM), and with a custom no-reference metric adapted from the Underwater Image Quality Measure (UIQM).
Results: The system achieved an average PSNR of 29.36 dB, an average SSIM of 0.8610 and an average custom UIQM-style score of 3.5692 on the 1,143-pair test split. The trained model was additionally deployed through an interactive Streamlit application supporting image upload, adjustable-resolution inference, before/after comparison and no-reference quality feedback.
Conclusions: A transparent, purely supervised reduced-depth U-Net pipeline, with a deterministically defined dataset organization, quantitative evaluation and an accessible interactive interface, provides a practical and reproducible basis for underwater image enhancement and for further development.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1.Jaffe JS. Computer modeling and the design of optimal underwater imaging systems. IEEE J Ocean Eng. 1990;15(2):101-111. doi:10.1109/48.50695.

2.Wang Z, Bovik AC, Sheikh HR, Simoncelli EP. Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2004;13(4):600-612. doi:10.1109/TIP.2003.819861.

3.He K, Sun J, Tang X. Single image haze removal using dark channel prior. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2011;33(12):2341-2353. doi:10.1109/TPAMI.2010.168.

4.Chiang JY, Chen YC. Underwater image enhancement by wavelength compensation and dehazing. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2012;21(4):1756-1769. doi:10.1109/TIP.2011.2179666.

5.Ancuti C, Ancuti CO, Haber T, Bekaert P. Enhancing underwater images and videos by fusion. In: Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR). 2012:81-88. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2012.6247661.

6.Drews P, Nascimento E, Moraes F, Botelho S, Campos M. Transmission estimation in underwater single images. In: Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis Workshops (ICCVW). 2013:825-830. doi:10.1109/ICCVW.2013.113.

7.Drews PL, Nascimento ER, Botelho SS, Campos MFM. Underwater depth estimation and image restoration based on single images. IEEE Comput Graph Appl. 2016;36(2):24-35. doi:10.1109/MCG.2016.26.

8.Cai B, Xu X, Jia K, Qing C, Tao D. DehazeNet: an end-to-end system for single image haze removal. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2016;25(11):5187-5198. doi:10.1109/TIP.2016.2598681.

9.Ronneberger O, Fischer P, Brox T. U-Net: convolutional networks for biomedical image segmentation. In: Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention (MICCAI 2015). LNCS vol. 9351. 2015:234-241. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-24574-4_28.

10.Yang M, Sowmya A. An underwater color image quality evaluation metric. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2015;24(12):6062-6071. doi:10.1109/TIP.2015.2491020.

11.Panetta K, Gao C, Agaian S. Human-visual-system-inspired underwater image quality measures. IEEE J Ocean Eng. 2016;41(3):541-551. doi:10.1109/JOE.2015.2469915.

12.Isola P, Zhu JY, Zhou T, Efros AA. Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks. In: Proc IEEE Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit (CVPR). 2017:1125-1134. doi:10.1109/CVPR.2017.632.

Downloads

Published

2017-08-20

Similar Articles

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.