Population Dynamics of Fruit Borer Heliothis armigera on Different Varieties of Tomato Crop

Authors

  • Ankita Awasthi
  • Sangeeta Avasthi

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i2.5354

Keywords:

Bioindicator, Heliothis armigera, Pant bahar, Pusa Gaurav, Arka abha, Arka Saurabh

Abstract

During the field experiments, population dynamics (multiplication per day, infestation per fruit and infestation rate) of Heliothis armigera were observed on different tomato varieties such as Arka abha, Arka Saurabh, Pant bahar, Ratna, and Pusa Gaurav. The minimum infestation (3.01%) of H. armigera during the cropping season was observed in tomato variety Pant Bahar at 9th standard weak in 81 days old crop. While maximum infestation (38.33%) of pest recorded on tomato variety Pusa Gaurav at 14th standard weak in 116 days old crop. The minimum intensity (0.04 larva/fruit) was found in 9th standard weak in 81 days old crop while it was maximum (0.54 larva/fruit) at 14th standard weak in 116 days old crop of tomato. The minimum multiplication (0.06 per day) found at 12th standard week and 102 days old crop. The maximum multiplication (0.96 multiplication per day) found at 10 February, 11 standard week and 95 days old crop. The infestation of the tomato fruit borer with its intensity increases continuously till the last picking of the fruit February to March found as conductive period.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Ankita Awasthi

Assistant Professor, Zoology department, A.N.D.N.N.M.M. College, Kanpur

Sangeeta Avasthi

Professor,Zoology department, A.N.D.N.N.M.M. College, Kanpur

References

1. Armes N.J., Jadhav D.R., Bond G.S., King A.B.S. (1992): Insecticide resistance in Helicoverpa armigera in Southern India. Pesticide Science, 34: 355-364.

2. Duncan O.D. (1966): Path analysis: Sociological examples. American Journal of Sociology, 72: 1-6.

3. Evans H.F., Shapiro M. (1997): Viruses. In: Lacey L. (ed.): Manual of Techniques in Insect Pathology. Academic Press, London: 17-54.

4. Fery R. L. and Cuthbert F. P. Jr. (1973) Factors affecting evaluation of fruit worm resistance in the tomato. J. Amer. Soc. Hort. Sci. 98(5), 457–459.

5. Geetha N., Rabindra R.J. (2000): Genetic variability and comparative virulence of some geographic isolates of nuclear polyhedrosis virus of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner).

6. Ignacimuthu S., Sen A., Janarthanan S. (eds): Biotechnological Applications for Integrated Pest Management. Oxford and IBH, New Delhi: 65-80.

7. Gopali J.B., Lingappa S. (2001): Selection of virulent strain of NPV against Helicoverpa armigera in pigeonpea ecosystem. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Science, 14: 1067-1071

8. Knapp J. L., Hedin P. A. and Douglas W. A. (1966) A chemical analysis of corn silk from single crosses of dent corn rated as resistant, intermediate and susceptible to the corn earworm. J. econ. Ent. 59, 1062–1064.

9. Lukefahr M. J. and Houghtaling J. E. (1969) Resistance of cotton strains with gossypol contents to Heliothis spp. J. econ. Ent. 62, 588–591.

10. Lukefahr M. J., Houghtaling J. E. and Grahm D. G. (1975) Suppression of Heliothis spp. with cottons containing combinations of resistant characters. J. econ. Ent. 68, 743–746.

11. Meeri, K.M. 2019. Effect of different temperatures on some biological traits of Rice weter weevil, (Taurnier) (Cleoptera : Curculionidae). Plant Archives. 19(1): 805-808.

12. Nasei, B, Fathipour, Y., Moharramipour, S, &Hosseininaveh, V. (2009) Comparative life history and fecundity of Helicoverpa (Hubnes) (Lepidopeia,Noctuidae) on different soybean varieties. Entomological Science 12,147-154.

13. Nunes MLS, Figueiredo LL, Andrade RDS, Rezende JM, Czepak C, Godinho KCA. Biology of Helicoverpa armigera (Hübner) (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) 2017. Rearing on Artificial or Natural Diet in Laboratory. Journal of Entomology; 14(4):168-175

14. Pandey RR, Gurang TB, GC-YD, Gurang G (1997) Monitoring and management of tomato fruit worm (Helicoverpa armigera) and its egg parasite (Trichogramma ishi) in western hills. Working Paper Lumle Regional Agricultural Research Center No 97-24 iii: 14

15. Pearce SL, Clarke DF, East PD, Elfekih S, Gordon KHJ, Jermiin LS et al. 2017. Genomic innovations, transcriptional plasticity and gene loss underlying the evolution and divergence of two highly polyphagous and invasive Helicoverpa pest species. BMC Biology; 15:63.

16. Parihar SBS, Singh BR (1986) Incidence of Heliothis armigera Hubner a fruit borer on tomato Indian Journal of Plant Protection 13 (2): 133-136

17. Ravi G, Verma S (1997) Seasonal incidence of chickpea pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera and its larval parasitoid on chickpea crop. Indian J Ent 59 (4): 359-361

18. Sharma SS (1997) Insect pest of kharif vegetables tomato. Advance Training Course on Insect Pest Management, HAU Hissar March 1997 pp-107

19. Sharma SK, Choudhary JP (1988) Effects of different levels of constant temperature and humidity on the development and survival of Heliothis armigera Hub. Indian J Ent 50 (1): 76-81

20. Tahhan O, Hariri G (1982) Priliminary study of trapping Heliothis armigera Hub with pheromones at ICARDA, Syria. Inter Chickpea Newsletter No 6: 31

Downloads

Published

2024-02-09

Issue

Section

Articles

Similar Articles

<< < 1 2 3 4 5 6 > >> 

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.