Exploring the Landscape of Cognitive Science: A Comprehensive Review
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v46i2.5255Keywords:
Cognitive Science, Human Mind, Ethical Considerations, Interdisciplinary Collaboration, Technological InnovationsAbstract
Cognitive science is a dynamic discipline that examines the complex mental processes connecting perception and action. It draws from a rich range of fields, including philosophy, psychology, artificial intelligence, neuroscience, linguistics, and anthropology. The foundation of progress in cognitive science lies in the collaborative interaction among these various disciplines, enhancing our ability to solve the mysteries of the human mind, utilise its potential for practical uses, and effectively tackle cognitive challenges.
Advancing knowledge and exploration in cognitive science is crucial for gaining a deeper understanding of ourselves and the complexities of our brains. Furthermore, the relationship between the mind and the environment is expected to usher in a new era of enhanced well-being and technological innovation. A central element of this effort is interdisciplinary education, which is vital in developing the next generation of cognitive scientists. Equipping them with a broad spectrum of skills prepares them for success in a continuously evolving and expanding field.
The interdisciplinary approach is also essential for addressing the ethical aspects of cognitive science. Additionally, interdisciplinary education plays a key role in preparing future cognitive scientists. Providing students with various techniques and knowledge from multiple disciplines enhances their problem-solving abilities. It fosters pioneering spirits, enabling them to navigate the complex landscape of cognitive science with creativity and innovation. This educational model equips them to confront the field's challenges directly and to develop innovative solutions.
Downloads
References
1. Aiping, X & Proctor, RW. (2018). Information Processing: The Language and Analytical Tools for Cognitive Psychology in the Information Age. Frontiers in Psychology, 9.2018.
2. Airenti, G. (2019). The place of development in the history of psychology and cognitive science. Frontiers in Psychology, 10, 895.
3. Alasehir, O & Acarturk, C. (2022). Interdisciplinarity in Cognitive Science: A Document Similarity Analysis. Cognitive Science, 46: e13222.
4. Ale, M, Sturdee, M & Rubegni, E. (2022). A systematic survey on embodied cognition:11 years of research in child–computer interaction. International Journal of Child-Computer Interaction 33 (2022): 100478
5. Anderson, BF. (1975). Cognitive psychology: The study of knowing, learning, and thinking. Academic Press.
6. Ansar, MRU & Ganesh, MP. (2023). Cognitive Styles Research: A Review of Theory, Assessments and Applications. International Journal of Indian Psychology, 11(1), 924-934.
7. Arnold, AE, Iaria, G & Ekstrom, AD. (2016). Mental simulation of routes during navigation involves adaptive temporal compression. Cognition, 157, 14–23.
8. Auger, SD, Zeidman, P & Maguire, EA. (2017). Efficacy of navigation may be influenced by retrosplenial cortex-mediated learning of landmark stability. Neuropsychologia, 104, 102–112.
9. Austin, P. (2021). Theory of language: A taxonomy. SN Soc Sci, 1, 78.
10. Banan, S, Ridwan, M & Adisaputera, A. (2020). A Study of Connectionism Theory. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal) Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(3), 2335-2342.
11. Barbey, AK, Karama, S & Haier, RJ. (2021). Cambridge Handbook of Intelligence and Cognitive Neuroscience. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
12. Barrett, HC. (2020). Towards a Cognitive Science of the Human: Cross-Cultural Approaches and Their Urgency. Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 24(8): 620-638.
13. Beheshti, A, Yakhchi, S, Mousaeirad, S, Ghafari, SM, Goluguri, SR & Edrisi, MA. (2020). Towards Cognitive Recommender Systems. Algorithms, 13(8), 176.
14. Belli, RF, Conrad, FG & Wright, DB. (2007). Cognitive Psychology and Survey Methodology: Nurturing the Continuing Dialogue between Disciplines. Faculty Publications, Department of Psychology. 379.
15. Bernacki, ML, Greene, MJ & Lobczowski, NG. (2021). A Systematic Review of Research on Personalized Learning: Personalized by Whom, to What, How, and for What Purpose(s)? Educ Psychol Rev 33, 1675–1715.
16. Caramazza, A & McCloskey, M. (1988). The case for single-patient studies. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 5, 517–527.
17. Caspar, F, Thomas Rothenfluh, T & Segal, Z. (1992). The appeal of connectionism for clinical psychology. Clinical Psychology Review, 12 (7): 719-762.
18. Chai, J, Zeng, H, Li, A & Ngai, EWT. (2021). Deep learning in computer vision: A critical review of emerging techniques and application scenarios. Machine Learning with Applications, 6(2021), 100134.
19. Chalmers D. (1993). Why Fodor and Pylyshyn were wrong: the simplest refutation. Philos. Psychol. 6, 305–319.
20. Chen, Y, Argentinis, JE & Weber, G. (2016). IBM Watson: how cognitive computing can be applied to big data challenges in life sciences research. Clinical therapeutics, 38(4), 688-701.
21. Chin, T, Caputo, F, Lin, CL & Hu, F. (2022) Editorial: Understanding cognitive differences across cultures: Integrating neuroscience and cultural psychology. Front. Psychol. 13:1041734
22. Chomsky N. (1981). Principles and parameters in syntactic theory. In: Hornstein N, Lightfoot D, editors. Explanation in Linguistics. The Logical Problem of Language Acquisition. London, UK: Longman.
23. Chomsky, N. (2014). Aspects of the Theory of Syntax (No. 11). MIT Press.
24. Churchland, PS & Sejnowski, TJ (1992). The computational brain. MIT press.
25. Clark, IA & Maguire, EA. (2020). Do questionnaires reflect their purported cognitive functions? Cognition. 2020 Feb;195:104114.
26. Corbetta, M & Fitzpatrick, S. (2011). Taking a Cognitive Neuroscience Approach to Neuro-rehabilitation. Neurorehabilitation and Neural Repair, 25(5 0), 3S.
27. Craver, CF. (2007). Explaining the brain: Mechanisms and the mosaic unity of neuroscience. Clarendon Press.
28. Croskerry, P, Campbell, SG & Petrie, DA. (2023). The challenge of cognitive science for medical diagnosis. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 8(1), 13.
29. Da Silva, JC & De Souza, ML. (2021). Neurofeedback training for cognitive performance improvement in healthy subjects: A systematic review. Psychology & Neuroscience, 14(3), 262.
30. Davelaar EJ. (2010). Cognitive science – future challenges of an interdisciplinary field. Front. Psychology 1:7.
31. Doroudi, S. (2023). The Intertwined Histories of Artificial Intelligence and Education. Int J Artif Intell Educ 33, 885–928. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40593-022-00313-2
32. Dubbels, B. (2011). Cognitive Ethnography: A Methodology for Measure and Analysis of Learning for Game Studies. IJGCMS. 3. 68-78.
33. Elam, JS, Glasser, MF, Harms, MP, Sotiropoulos, SN, Andersson, JL, Burgess, GC, Curtiss, SW, Sandra WC, Oostenveld, R, Larson-Prior, LJ, Schoffelen, JM, Hodge, MR, Cler, EA, Marcus, DM, Barch, DM, Yacoub, E, Smith, SM, Ugurbil, K & Van Essen, DC. (2021). The human connectome project: a retrospective. NeuroImage, 244, 118543.
34. Ember, CR. (1977). Cross-Cultural Cognitive Studies. Annual Review of Anthropology, 6, 33–56.
35. Evans, V. (2012). Cognitive linguistics. WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, 3:129–141.
36. Fan, J, Fang, L, Wu, J, Guo, Y, Dai, Q. (2020). From Brain Science to Artificial Intelligence, Engineering. 6:3, 248-252.
37. Feldman, JA & Ballard, DH. (1982). Connectionist models and their properties. Cognitive Science. 6 (3): 205-254.
38. Fodor, J & Pylyshyn Z. (1988). Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis. Cognition 28, 3–71.
39. Forbus, KD. (2010). AI and cognitive science: the past and next 30 years. opics in cognitive science, 2(3), 345–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1756-8765.2010.01083.x
40. Grammer, JK, Coffman, JL, Ornstein, PA & Morrison, FJ. (2013). Change Over Time: Conducting Longitudinal Studies of Children's Cognitive Development, Journal of Cognition and Development, 14:4, 515-528.
41. Gupta, S, Kar, AK, Baabdullah, A & Al-Khowaiter, WA. (2018). Big data with cognitive computing: A review for the future. International Journal of Information Management, 42, 78-89.
42. Hinton, GE. (1989). Connectionist learning procedures. Artificial Intelligence, 40, 185-234.
43. Hohol, M (2021). Cognitive science: an interdisciplinary approach to mind and cognition. In Brożek, B, Jakubiec, M, Urbańczyk P. (Eds.), Perspectives on interdisciplinarity (33–55), Krakow: Copernicus Center Press.
44. Khurana, D, Koli, A, Khatter, K & Singh, S. (2023). Natural language processing: State of the art, current trends and challenges. Multimedia Tools and Applications, 82, 3713–3744.
45. König, P, Wilming, N, Kietzmann, TC, Ossandón, JP, Onat, S, Ehinger, BV, Gameiro, RR & Kaspar, K. (2016). Eye movements as a window to cognitive processes. Journal of Eye Movement Research, 9(5).
46. Lewandowski, G & Strohmetz, D. (2009). Actions can speak as loud as words: Measuring behavior in psychological science. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 3(6), 992–1002.
47. Leydesdorff, L & Goldstone, RL. (2013). Interdisciplinarity at the journal and specialty level: The changing knowledge bases of the journal cognitive science. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 65(1), 164–177.
48. Lieberman, MD. (2007). Social cognitive neuroscience: A review of core processes. Annual Review of Psychology, 58, 259-289.
49. Litwinczuk, MC, Trujillo-Barreto, N, Muhlert, N, Cloutman, L & Woollams, A. (2023). Relating Cognition to both Brain Structure and Function: A Systematic Review of Methods. Brain Connect, 13, 120–132.
50. Loriette, C, Ziane, C & Hamed, SB. (2021). Neurofeedback for cognitive enhancement and intervention and brain plasticity. Revue Neurologique, 177(9), 1133-1144.
51. Martin, SR & Huettel, SA. (2013). Cognitive Functions as Revealed by Imaging of the Human Brain. In Pfaff DW (Ed.), Neuroscience in the 21st Century. Springer, New York, NY.
52. McQuail, JA., Dunn, AR., Stern, Y, Barnes, CA, Kempermann, G, Rapp, PR, Kaczorowski, CC & Foster TC. (2021). Cognitive Reserve in Model Systems for Mechanistic Discovery: The Importance of Longitudinal Studies. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 12, 607685.
53. Miller, GA. (2003). The cognitive revolution: A historical perspective. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 7(3), March 2003.
54. Morita, T, Asada, M & Naito, E. (2016). Contribution of Neuroimaging Studies to Understanding Development of Human Cognitive Brain Functions. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 10, 464.
55. Nápolesa, G, Grauc, I & Salgueiro, Y. (2020). Recommender system using Long-term Cognitive Networks. Knowledge-Based Systems, 206, 106372.
56. Nersessian, NJ. (2019). Interdisciplinarities in Action: Cognitive Ethnography of Bioengineering Sciences Research Laboratories. Perspectives on Science, 27(4), 553-581.
57. Newell, A. (1994). Unified theories of cognition. Harvard University Press.
58. Nuwan Leitan, N & Chaffey, L. (2014). Embodied Cognition and its applications: A brief review. Sensoria: A Journal of Mind, Brain, and Culture, 10(1), 3-10.
59. Perlovsky, L. (2011). Language and cognition interaction neural mechanisms. Computational Intelligence in Neuroscience, 2011, 454587.
60. Posner, MI & DiGirolamo, GJ. (2000). Cognitive Neuroscience: Origins and Promise. Psychological Bulletin, 126(6), 673-689.
61. Proctor, RW & Vu, KPL. (2012). Human Information Processing. In Seel NM (Ed.), Encyclopedia of the Sciences of Learning. Springer.
62. Quinlan, PT. (1991). Connectionism and psychology: A psychological perspective on new connectionist research. University of Chicago Press.
63. Rao, VC. (2021). Cognitive Linguistics: An Approach to the Study of Language and Thought. Journal for Research Scholars and Professionals of English Language Teaching, 5, 24.
64. Reiner, M, Gruzelier, J, Bamidis, PD & Auer, T. (2018). The science of neurofeedback: learnability and effects. Neuroscience, 378, 1-10.
65. Riva, G, Mancuso, V, Cavedoni, S & Stramba-Badiale, C. (2020). Virtual reality in neurorehabilitation: a review of its effects on multiple cognitive domains. Expert Review of Medical Devices, 17(10), 1035-1061.
66. Robertson, LC, Knight, RT, Rafal, R & Shimamura, AP. (1993). Cognitive neuropsychology is more than single-case studies. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19, 710-717; discussion 718-734.
67. Rosenbaum, RS, Gilboa, A & Moscovitch, M. (2014). Case studies continue to illuminate the cognitive neuroscience of memory. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1316, 105-133.
68. Roy, D & Dutta, M. (2022). A systematic review and research perspective on recommender systems. Journal of Big Data, 9, 59.
69. Russell, SJ & Norvig, P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: A modern approach (3rd ed.). Pearson Education.
70. Sadato, N, Morita, T & Itakura, S. (2008). The Role of Neuroimaging in Developmental Social Psychology. Brain Imaging and Behavior, 2, 335-342.
71. Sarter, M, Berntson, GG & Cacioppo, JT. (1996). Brain Imaging and Cognitive Neuroscience: Toward Strong Inference in Attributing Function to Structure. American Psychologist, 51(1), 13-21.
72. Sawyer, KR. (2006). The new science of learning. In Sawyer K (Ed.), The Cambridge handbook of the learning sciences (pp. 1-16).
73. Schmidt, HG & Mamede, S. (2020). How cognitive psychology changed the face of medical education research. Advances in Health Sciences Education, Theory and Practice, 25(5), 1025-1043.
74. Schneider, W. (1987). Connectionism: Is it a paradigm shift for psychology? Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, & Computers, 19, 73-83.
75. Shahid, SH, Khan, MA & Ishtiaq, M. (2023). An Overview of the Information Processing Approach and its Application to Memory, Language, and Working Memory. Pakistan Languages and Humanities Review, 6, 615-628.
76. Shemshack, A & Spector, JM. (2020). A systematic literature review of personalized learning terms. Smart Learning Environments, 7, 33.
77. Siemens, G, Marmolejo-Ramos, F, Gabriel, F, Medeiros, K, Marrone, R, Joksimovic, S & Maarten de Laat. (2022). Human and artificial cognition. Computers and Education: Artificial Intelligence, 3, 100107.
78. Sloman, SA, Patterson, R & Barbey, AK. (2021). Cognitive Neuroscience Meets the Community of Knowledge. Frontiers in Systems Neuroscience, 15, 675127.
79. Stuss, DT. (2011). The future of cognitive neurorehabilitation. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 21(5), 755-768.
80. Sullivan, J. (2015). Experimentation in Cognitive Neuroscience and Cognitive Neurobiology. In Clausen J & Levy N (Eds.), Handbook of Neuroethics (pp. 32-46). Springer Science + Business Media Dordrecht.
81. Thagard, P. (2007). Theory and experiment in cognitive science. Artificial Intelligence, 171, 1104-1106.
82. Thamiris de Souza, A, Silva de Oliveira, C, Sanin, C & Szczerbicki E. (2018). From Knowledge-based Vision Systems to Cognitive Vision Systems: A Review. Procedia Computer Science, 126, 1855-1864.
83. Ullman, S. (2019). Using neuroscience to develop artificial intelligence. Science, 363(6428), 692-693.
84. Vanneste, P, Oramas, J, Verelst, T, Tuytelaars, T, Raes, A, Depaepe, F & Van den Noortgate, W. (2021). Computer Vision and Human Behaviour, Emotion and Cognition Detection: A Use Case on Student Engagement. Mathematics, 9(3), 287.
85. Wermter, S & Sun, R. (2000). An Overview of Hybrid Neural Systems. In: Wermter, S, Sun, R (Eds.) Hybrid Neural Systems. Hybrid Neural Systems 1998. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol 1778, pp 1–13. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg.
86. Williams, RF. (2006). Using cognitive ethnography to study instruction. Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of the Learning Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
87. Willis, J & Donna, GD. (1978). Behaviorism in the Twentieth Century: What we have here is a failure to communicate. Behavior Therapy, Volume 9, Issue 1, 1978, Pages 15-27.
88. Wilson, AD & Golonka, S. (2013). Embodied Cognition is Not What you Think it is. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 58. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00058
89. Wilson, RC & Collins, AGE. (2019). Ten simple rules for the computational modeling of behavioral data. eLife, 8:e49547.
90. Xue, G, Chen, C, Lu, ZL & Dong, Q. (2010). Brain Imaging Techniques and Their Applications in Decision-Making Research. Xin li xue bao. Acta psychologica Sinica, 42(1), 120–137. https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1041.2010.00120
91. Yen, C, Lin, CL & Chiang, MC. (2023). Exploring the Frontiers of Neuroimaging: A Review of Recent Advances in Understanding Brain Functioning and Disorders. Life, 13(7): 1472.
92. Zhao, J, Wu, M, Zhou, L, Wang, X & Jia, J. (2022). Cognitive psychology-based artificial intelligence review. Frontiers in neuroscience, 16, 1024316. https://doi.org/10.3389/ fnins.2022.1024316
93. Zheng, Y & Ye, Y. (2022). Prediction of Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy using Deep Learning for the Treatment of Adolescent Social Anxiety and Mental Health Conditions. Scientific Programming, vol. 2022, Article ID 3187403, 9 pages, 2022. https://doi.org/10.1155 /2022/3187403
94. Zouganeli, E & Lentzas, A. (2022). Cognitive Robotics - Towards the Development of Next-Generation Robotics and Intelligent Systems. In: Zouganeli, E, Yazidi, A, Mello, G, Lind, P. (Eds.) Nordic Artificial Intelligence Research and Development. NAIS 2022. Communications in Computer and Information Science, vol 1650. Springer, Cham.
95. Zuidema, W, French, RM, Alhama, RG, Ellis, K, O'Donnell, TJ, Sainburg, T & Gentner, TQ. (2020). Five Ways in which computational modeling can help advance cognitive science: Lessons from artificial grammar learning. Topics in Cognitive Science, 12(3), 925–941.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Aanchal Sharma, Swati Pal, Tanushree Sharma, Madhu Yashpal, Kuntal, Parminder Kaur Narang
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
