Spatio-Temporal Variations in Amphibian Communities in Semi-Urban Ponds of District Panchkula
Main Article Content
Abstract
Surveillance studies were undertaken in the village ponds of Saketri, Shamtu, and Khangsera (district Panchkula, Haryana) to document amphibian diversity and abundance. Four species—Duttaphrynus melanostictus, D. stomaticus, Euphlyctis cyanophlyctis, and Hoplobatrachus tigerinus—belonging to the families Bufonidae and Dicroglossidae (order Anura) were recorded, all categorized as “Least Concern” on the IUCN Red List. Results showed species-specific and site-specific variations in abundance, with D. melanostictus dominating in Saketri and Shamtu, while D. stomaticus was most abundant in Khangsera. Aquatic habitats supported fewer species, with E. cyanophlyctis and H. tigerinus being the predominant forms. A decline in amphibian populations was observed from 2021 to 2022, with the highest reduction recorded in Shamtu pond (5.90% on land; 11.53% in water). The study suggests that habitat fragmentation, pond surroundings, and urbanization significantly influence amphibian assemblages.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
1. Mittermeier R A and Werner T B (1990) Wealth of plants and animals unites megadiversity countries. Tropicus 4(1): 4-5.
2. Gunther A C (1864) The reptiles of British India. London: Ray Society by R. Hardwicke pp: 1-26.
3. Frost and Darrel R (2021) Amphibian Species of the World: An Online Reference.
4. Hecnar S J and McCloskey R T (1997) Spatial scale and determination of species status of the green frog. Conserv Biol 11: 670-82.
5. Stebbins R C and Cohen N W (1997) A Natural History of Amphibians. Princeton university Press, Princeton.
6. Daniel J C (1963) Field guide to amphibians of western India - Part I J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 60: 415-38.
7. Daniel J C and Sekar A G (1989) Field guide to amphibians of western India- Part IV. J Bombay Nat Hist Soc 86: 194-202.
8. Hamer A J and McDonnell M J (2008) Amphibian ecology and conservation in the urbanizing world: A Review. Biol Conserv 141: 2432-49.
9. Hamer A J, Makings J A, Lane S J, Mahony M J (2004) Amphibian decline and fertilizers used on agricultural land in south-eastern Australia. Agricu Ecosyst Environ 102: 299-305.
10. Krishnamurthy S V (2003) Amphibian assemblages in undisturbed and disturbed areas of Kudremukh National Park, central Western Ghats, India. Environ Conserv 30(3): 274-82.
11. Calderon M R, Almeida C A, González P, Jofré B M (2019) Influence of water quality and habitat conditions on amphibian community metrics in rivers affected by urban activity. Urban ecosyst 22: 743-55.
12. Formanowicz DR Jr and Bobka M S (1989) Predation risk and microhabitat preference: an experimental study of the behavioral responses of prey and predator. Am Midl Nat 121: 379-86.
13. Egan R S and Paton P W C (2004) Within-pond parameters affecting oviposition by wood frogs and spotted salamanders. Wetlands 24: 1-13.
14. Seale D B (1982) Physical factors influencing oviposition by the wood frog, Rana sylvatica, in Pennsylvania. Copeia (3): 627-35.
15. Werner E E and Glennemeier K S (1999) Influence of forest canopy cover on breeding pond distributions of several amphibian species. Copeia 9:1-12.