A Conceptual Framework for Corporate Social Responsibility and Business Ethics
Main Article Content
Abstract
In colloquial terms, "business ethics" typically refers to the principles and guidelines governing the conduct of businesses. Historically, it has been used to outline the acceptable and unacceptable behaviors for businesses, including adhering to laws, avoiding unethical practices, contributing to charitable causes, undertaking development projects in underserved areas, ensuring fair treatment of employees, and maintaining positive public relations. However, the concept of business ethics has evolved significantly in recent years.
Instead of merely prescribing dos and don'ts for businesses, business ethics now encapsulates fundamental beliefs about the role of businesses in society. There is a growing consensus that businesses have a responsibility to society and should fulfill this obligation in a transparent and easily understandable manner. It is widely acknowledged that businesses, as social entities, should not engage in activities that harm society or stakeholders.
This paper focuses on the shifting landscape from Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) to a broader understanding of business ethics.
Downloads
Article Details
![Creative Commons License](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Frederic Post, Davis. Business and Society, Mc.Graw Hill, 1992, 53
Raj Rituparna. A Study in Business Ethics, Himalaya Publishing House, 2001, 164-166
Sherlekar SA. Management Value Oriented Holistic Approach, Himalaya Publishing House, 1997, 21
Singh LP. Business Ethics in India and Abroad: An Overview, The Journal of L.N. Mithila University, Darbhanga, 2004, 18-19
Misha Rajan. Human Values, University Science Press, New Delhi, 2009, 112
I bid. 114-119
Godfrey Adda, Dr. John Bosco Azigwe, Aboteyure Roger Awuni. Business Ethics and Corporate Social Responsibility for Business Success and Growth, European Journal of Business and Innovation Research. 2016; 4(6):26-42.