In vitro Assessment of Neonicotinoids and Pyrethroids against Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii Sign. (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Guava

Main Article Content

Kanimozhi Elango
Jeyarani Subramanian
Murugan Marimuthu
Muthiah Chinniah
Johnson Thangaraj Edward Y S
Mohankumar Subbarayalu
Muthuvel Iyyamperumal

Abstract

The tea mosquito bug (TMB), Helopeltis antonii, is an emerging pest of horticultural crops, specially on guava and moringa. Insecticides are indispensable component for the management of insect pests. Exploration of new molecules with shortest waiting period may pave way for managing TMB in fruit and vegetable crops with nil/low residue. Until now there are no recommended insecticides available under Central Insecticides Board & Registration Committee (CIB&RC) against TMB on guava. In view of the above facts, new molecules with a low waiting period and are recommended by CIB&RC on tea, viz., Clothianidin 50% WDG, Thiacloprid 21.7% SC, Bifenthrin 10% EC, and Thiamethoxam 12.60% + Lambda-Cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC, were chosen and evaluated against TMB under in vitro condition. Clothianidin 50% WDG recorded the highest mortality of 100.00 per cent at 72 hours after treatment (HAT), and the lowest LC50 value (0.328 ppm, fiducial limits: 0.144-0.515 ppm) and LT50 value (10.49 h, fiducial limits: 5.444-14.551 h), followed by Thiamethoxam 12.60% + Lambda-Cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC, Thiacloprid 21.7% SC, and Bifenthrin 10% EC. The results showed that the Clothianidin 50% WDG and Thiamethoxam 12.60% + Lambda-Cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC, were highly effective, with the lowest LC50 and LT50 values. Since TMB occurs from new flushing to fruiting stage of guava, a minimum of two sprays are mandatory to have quality fruit yield. Hence, application of Clothianidin 50% WDG followed by Thiamethoxam 12.60% + Lambda-Cyhalothrin 9.5% ZC on need basis will help to reduce the impact of TMB on guava.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Elango, K., Subramanian, J. ., Marimuthu, M. ., Chinniah, M. ., Y S, J. T. E., Subbarayalu, M. ., & Iyyamperumal, M. . (2023). In vitro Assessment of Neonicotinoids and Pyrethroids against Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii Sign. (Hemiptera: Miridae) on Guava. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44(5), 767–771. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v44i5.2901
Section
Articles

References

Abbott, W. S. 1925. A method of computing the effectiveness of an insecticide. J. Econ. Entomol., 18(2): 265-267.

Aravinthraju, K., K. Suresh & S. Manisegaran, 2022. Efficacy of bio-rationales against tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis antonii Signoret in guava. Int. J. Trop. Insect Sci., 42(6): 3869-3875.

Aravinthraju, K., K. Suresh, S. Manisegaran & C. Rajamanickam, 2021. Efficacy of Certain Insecticides Against Tea Mosquito Bug, Helopeltis antonii Signoret in Guava. Indian j. entomol., 83(2): 211-212.

De Silva, M. D. 1957. A new Species of Helopeltis (Hemiptera - Heteroptera, Miridae) found in Ceylon. Bull. Entomol. Res., 48(3): 459-461.

Finney, D. J. 1971. Probit analysis: 3d ed. Cambridge University Press.

Mala, B. R., P. D. Jayanthi, T. Nagaraja & P. S. Bhat, 2020. Monitoring tea mosquito bug, Helopeltis antonii Signoret (Homoptera: Miridae) using sticky traps on drumstick, Moringa Oleifera Lam. Pest Mgt. Hort. Ecosyst., 26(2): 279-281.

Patil, G. R. & L. Krishna Naik, 2004. Studies on the seasonal incidence of tea mosquito bug on guava cultivars. Karnataka J. Agric. Sci., 17(2): 339-340.

Rao, G. N. 1970. Helopeltis: A breakthrough in its control. UPASI Tea Science Department Bulletin, 28(2): 1-28.

Rao, Y. R. 1915. Helopeltis antonii as a pest of neem trees. Indian J. Agric. Sci., 10: 412-416.

Samanta, A., S. K. F. Alam, S. Patra, S. Sarkar, & P. K. Dey, 2017. Alika 247 ZC (Thiamethoxam 12.6%+ Lambda-Cyhalothrin 9.5%) against Pest Complex of Tea in West Bengal. Pestic. Res. J., 29(2): 230-235.

Stonedahl, G. M. 1991. The Oriental species of Helopeltis (Heteroptera: Miridae): a review of economic literature and guide to identification. Bull. Entomol. Res., 81(4): 465-490.

Sundararaju, D. 1996. Helopeltis spp. with special reference to H. antonii Sign. in Tamil Nadu. Doctoral dissertation, Ph D thesis, TNAU, Coimbatore. p: 210.

Sundararaju, D. & N. N. Bakthavatsalam, 1994. Pests of Cashew. In: Advances in Horticulture (Eds). Chadha KL and Rethinam P. Malhotra Publishing House, New Delhi, 10: 759-785.

Sundararaju, D. & J. N. John, 1992. Susceptibility of cashew accessions to Helopeltis antonii Sign. (Heteroptera: Miridae), in the pre-flowering phase. J. Plant. Crops, 21: 50-50.

Sundararaju, D. & Sundarababu, P. C. 1999. Helopeltis spp. (Heteroptera: Miridae) and their management in plantation and horticultural crops of India. J. Plant. Crops, 27(3): 155-174.