The Legal Dynamics of E-Commerce and Direct Selling: A Comprehensive Analysis of The Amway India Enterprises Vs. Union of India Case

Main Article Content

Ashfaq Pathan
Ketan Desai
Ruchi Tiwari

Abstract

This research paper delves into the landmark case of Amway India Enterprises vs. Union of India, adjudicated by the Delhi High Court in July 2019. The case pertained to alleged interference by e-commerce giants such as Amazon and Flipkart in the contractual relationships between direct selling companies and their independent sales representatives. The paper dissects the intricate legal facets of this case, encompassing constitutional matters, intellectual property rights, information technology laws, consumer protection, and contractual and tort laws. A central issue examined was whether e-commerce platforms were bound by the Direct Selling Guidelines, 2016, and if their actions constituted trademark violations. The case also probed the applicability of Section 79 of the Information Technology Act and intermediary responsibilities. The Delhi High Court's judgment wielded substantial influence over the Indian business landscape. E-commerce platforms were mandated to cease commercial activity on plaintiffs' products and furnish detailed seller data, necessitating operational adjustments. In conclusion, the Amway India Enterprises case signifies the evolving commerce dynamics in the digital era and underscores the pivotal role of the legal system in ensuring fair competition, consumer safety, and intellectual property preservation. As business landscapes evolve, this case illuminates the path toward a responsible, transparent, and secure online marketplace in India.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ashfaq Pathan, Ketan Desai, & Ruchi Tiwari. (2022). The Legal Dynamics of E-Commerce and Direct Selling: A Comprehensive Analysis of The Amway India Enterprises Vs. Union of India Case. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 43(1), 220–226. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v43i1.1288
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Ashfaq Pathan

Research Scholar, Parul Institute of Law, Parul University

Ketan Desai

Associate Professor, Parul Institute of Law, Parul University

Ruchi Tiwari

Associate Professor, Parul Institute of Law, Parul University

References

Aiken M, Parker C. Multi-Level Marketing and the Law: Balancing Entrepreneurship and Consumer Protection. Journal of Consumer & Commercial Law. 2019;20(3):303-331.

Babu RR, Anand P. Legal aspects of multilevel marketing in India: negotiating through murky waters. Decision. 2015 Dec;42:359-78.

Chou S. Legal Challenges of Cross-Border E-commerce. Asian Social Science. 2018;14(3):120-127.

Davis J, Smith R. E-commerce Platforms and Consumer Protection: A Legal Perspective. Journal of E-Commerce Research. 2018;19(2):83-100.

Duffy DL. Direct selling as the next channel. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2005 Jan 1;22(1):43-5.

Duffy DL. Direct selling as the next channel. Journal of Consumer Marketing. 2005 Jan 1;22(1):43-5.

Gupta A. From ‘Sherlockian Venture’to a ‘Matter of Trial’: Delhi High Court adds to the plight of the Indian direct selling market. Journal of Intellectual Property Law & Practice. 2020 May 1;15(5):324-5.

Jain A, Bansal R. Trademark Protection in E-Commerce: Strategies and Challenges. International Journal of E-Commerce Studies. 2018;19(1):1-18.

Lewis GA. The Regulation of Multi-Level Marketing Companies: A Comparative Analysis of Legislation in India and the United States. Issue 2 Indian JL & Legal Rsch.. 2022;4:1.

Liu Y, Zhang M. Building Trust in E-Commerce: Mechanisms and Implications for Consumer Protection. Information Systems Research. 2019;30(3):1092-1110.

Martin K, Green L. Tortious Interference in E-Commerce: An Evolving Legal Landscape. Journal of Internet Law. 2017;21(8):3-15.

Neațu AM, Imbrișcă CI. An overview of the direct selling industry. Annals of the University of Oradea, Economic Science Series. 2016;25:987-94.

Raymond L, Baharudin Y. The Development of E-Commerce Legal Framework in Malaysia: A Review. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. 2016;224:570-577.

Robertson S, Anderson P. Tortious Interference and Remedies in E-Commerce: A Legal Analysis. International Journal of Law and Management. 2019;61(6):1289-1307.

Smith P, Johnson L. Intellectual Property Protection in E-commerce: Challenges and Solutions. Journal of Intellectual Property Rights. 2017;22(4):265-278.

Tiwari RV. A Study of Rights of Farmers with Reference to IPR and Laws Relating to the Seed in India (Doctoral dissertation, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda (India)).

Vankova V, Cheshmedzhiev S. The Legal Framework for Direct Selling in Bulgaria: Challenges and Prospects. Contemporary Legal Issues. 2019;30(1):77-94.

Varma SV. The Impact of Demonetization on Digital Modes of Payment. Quarterly Journal of Management Development.:19.

Varma V. Prompt Corrective Action: A crucial component of Credit Performance of Banks.

Vipinchandra TR. A study of rights of farmers with reference to IPR and laws relating to the seed in india.

Zhang C, Li Y, Ma Y. Direct selling, agent selling, or dual-format selling: Electronic channel configuration considering channel competition and platform service. Computers & Industrial Engineering. 2021 Jul 1;157:107368.