Effectiveness Of Sensitization Programme On Level Of Acceptance, Regarding Hpv Screening With Self Sampling Method (SSM) Vs Assisted Sampling Method (ASM) Among The Women – Pilot Study Report

Main Article Content

Ankita Jacob
Dr. Manjubala Dash
Dr. Malarvizhi
Dr. Jayestri Kurushev

Abstract

Screening for cancer is plays important role to reduce mortality and morbidity by early detection and treatment. However, despite availability of various screening method for cervical cancer, women are not showing interest to participate in screening in regions where programme are available.


Objective


To assess the effectiveness of sensitization program on level of acceptance among group I and group II women at the selected Villages of Puducherry.


Methodology


Quantitative research approach and Quasi experimental design  was adopted in this study. Simple random sampling Technique was adopted to select the sample for the study. Total 20 Samples - 10 for experimental group and 10 for control group were selected.


Result and Findings:    Regarding demographic variable the study findings are: majority 40% and 70% of women were in the age group of 25-35yrs and 36-45yrs in the group I and II respectively.


With regards to acceptance of Screening method it was found that in group I all 10(100%) women had accepted whereas from group II only 1(10%) had accepted for test


Conclusion-  This study findings highlights that participants acceptance towards self sampling method is better than for assisted sampling method. Hence there should be more awareness progamme to be conducted for self sampling procedure and facility to be provided all health centers for this method for all women

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
Ankita Jacob, Dr. Manjubala Dash, Dr. Malarvizhi, & Dr. Jayestri Kurushev. (2024). Effectiveness Of Sensitization Programme On Level Of Acceptance, Regarding Hpv Screening With Self Sampling Method (SSM) Vs Assisted Sampling Method (ASM) Among The Women – Pilot Study Report. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 45(2), 1315–1320. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v45i2.4126
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

Ankita Jacob

Research Scholar, MTPG & RIHS

Dr. Manjubala Dash

Prof & Head , Dept of OBG, MTPG & RIHS

Dr. Malarvizhi

Prof & Head dept of Med Surg Nsg, PIMS

Dr. Jayestri Kurushev

Prof & Head, Dept of MHN, MTPG & RIHS

References

Bruni, Laia et al.The Cervical cancer screening programmes and age-specific coverage estimates for 202 countries and territories worldwide: a review and synthetic analysis Lancet Global Health, Volume 10, Issue 8, e1115 - e1127.

Nwabichie, C. C., Manaf, R. A., & Ismail, S. B. (2018). Factors Affecting Uptake of Cervical Cancer Screening Among African Women in Klang Valley, Malaysia. Asian Pacific journal of cancer prevention : APJCP, 19(3), 825–831. https://doi.org/10.22034/APJCP.2018.19.3.825

Siddharthar J, Rajkumar B, Deivasigamani K. Knowledge, awareness and prevention of cervical cancer among women attending a tertiary care hospital in puducherry, India. J Clin Diagn Res 2014;8:OC01‑3.

Driscoll SD. Barriers and facilitators to cervical cancer screening in high incidence populations: A synthesis of qualitative evidence. Women Health 2016;56:448‑67.

Institute National du Cancer. La situation du cancer en France. 2012.

Haute Autorité de Santé. Etat des lieux et recommandations pour le dépistage du cancer du col de l’utérus en France. 2010.

Patra S, Upadhyay M, Chhabra P. Awareness of cervical cancer and willingness to participate in screening program: Public health policy implications. J Cancer Res Ther 2017;13:318-23.

Bobdey S, Sathwara J, Jain A, Balasubramaniam G. Burden of cervical cancer and role of screening in India. Indian J Med Paediatr Oncol. 2016;37(4):278–85.

Sancho-Garnier H, Tamalet C, Halfon P, Leandri FX, Le Retraite L, Djoufelkit K, et al. HPV self-sampling or the Pap-smear: a randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(11):2681–7.

Sancho-Garnier H, Tamalet C, Halfon P, Leandri FX, Le Retraite L, Djoufelkit K, et al. HPV self-sampling or the Pap-smear: a randomized study among cervical screening nonattenders from lower socioeconomic groups in France. Int J Cancer. 2013;133(11):2681–7.

Arbyn M, Weiderpass E, Bruni L, de Sanjosé S, Saraiya M, Ferlay J, Bray F. Estimates of incidence and mortality of cervical cancer in 2018: a worldwide analysis. Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e191-e203. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30482-6. Epub 2019 Dec 4. Erratum in: Lancet Glob Health. 2022 Jan;10(1):e41. PMID: 31812369; PMCID: PMC7025157.

World Health Organization. (‎2020)‎. WHO recommendations on self-care interventions: human papillomavirus (‎HPV)‎ self-sampling as part of cervical cancer screening. World Health Organization. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/332333. License: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO

Kumar MS, Shanmugapriya PC, Kaur P. Acceptance of cervical and breast cancer screening and cancer awareness among women in Villupuram, Tamil Nadu, India: A cross sectional survey. Clin Epidemiol Glob Heal 2015;3:S63-8. Available from: https://www.ceghonline.com/article/S2213-3984(15)00075-5/fulltext.

Yeh PT, Kennedy CE, de Vuyst H, et al. Self-sampling for human papillomavirus (HPV) testing: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Global Health 2019;4:e001351. doi:10.1136/ bmjgh-2018-001351

Hawkes D, Keung MHT, Huang Y, McDermott TL, Romano J, Saville M, Brotherton JML. Self-Collection for Cervical Screening Programs: From Research to Reality. Cancers (Basel). 2020 Apr 24;12(4):1053. doi: 10.3390/cancers12041053. PMID: 32344565; PMCID: PMC7226191.