Study On Impact of Sound Frequency on Human Well Being Using Randomized Block Design

Main Article Content

S. I. Unhale
S. L. Khairnar
M. A. Joshi

Abstract

This study summarizes the exploration of the impact of sound frequencies on various dimensions of human well-being. The study investigates the psychological and physiological responses to different sound frequencies, considering factors such as emotional states, focus, stress relief, and pain perception. The experiment draws on established psychoacoustic principles and incorporates data from controlled experiments, including a Randomized Block Design (RBD). The study employs statistical analyses, such as ANOVA, to discern the significance of Intercept, Block Number, and Sound Frequency in predicting variations in well-being outcomes.the study revealed valuable insights into the factors influencing different dimensions of human well-being. The consistent significance of Intercept, Block Number, and Sound Frequency across various aspects suggests the importance of considering both individual and external factors, as well as the specific frequencies of sounds, in understanding and promoting well-being. These findings can have implications for designing interventions or environments that aim to enhance different aspects of human well-being through targeted sound exposure.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Article Details

How to Cite
S. I. Unhale, S. L. Khairnar, & M. A. Joshi. (2023). Study On Impact of Sound Frequency on Human Well Being Using Randomized Block Design. Journal of Advanced Zoology, 44(S8), 01–11. https://doi.org/10.53555/jaz.v44iS8.3467
Section
Articles
Author Biographies

S. I. Unhale

Department of Mathematics. Changu Kana Thakur Arts, Commerce and Science College, New Panvel.

S. L. Khairnar

Department of Mathematics. Changu Kana Thakur Arts, Commerce and Science College, New Panvel.

M. A. Joshi

Department of Mathematics. Changu Kana Thakur Arts, Commerce and Science College, New Panvel.

References

American National Standards Institute (ANSI). (2021). ANSI S3.1-1999 (R2018): Maximum Permissible Ambient Noise Levels for Audiometric Test Rooms. American National Standards Institute.

Yantis, M. (2017). The Psychology of Music: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press.

Ash, A. (2008). Acoustics and the Performance of Music: Manual for Acousticians, Audio Engineers, Musicians, Architects and Musical Instrument Makers. Elsevier.

Berglund, B., Lindvall, T., & Schwela, D. H. (Eds.). (1999). Guidelines for Community Noise. World Health Organization.

ISO 226:2003. (2003). Acoustics – Normal Equal-Loudness-Level Contours. International Organization for Standardization.

Kryter, K. D. (1985). The Effects of Noise on Man. Academic Press.

Maffei, L., & Anderson, D. J. (2017). Acoustic Environments and Human Performance: Research and Practice. Springer.

Marples, D., & Alderson, A. (1994). An Introduction to Psychoacoustics. Academic Press.

Møller, H. (2000). Fundamentals of Noise and Vibration Analysis for Engineers. Springer.

NIOSH. (1998). Criteria for a Recommended Standard: Occupational Noise Exposure. National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Zwicker, E., & Fastl, H. (1999). Psychoacoustics: Facts and Models. Springer.

ISO 1996-1:2016. (2016). Acoustics – Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise – Part 1: Basic Quantities and Assessment Procedures. International Organization for Standardization.

ISO 1996-2:2017. (2017). Acoustics – Description, Measurement and Assessment of Environmental Noise – Part 2: Determination of Environmental Noise Levels. International Organization for Standardization.