About concept and linguocultureme in the anthropocentric paradigm
Main Article Content
Abstract
It is known, the anthropocentric paradigm is a set of ideas that study language not as a dry structure, but as an open system based on living dialogue and communication, analyzing other systems in their integral relationship with people, society, culture, etc .Linguistics, which is considered one of the leading directions of anthropocentric linguistics, arose in the field of linguistics, cultural studies, ethnography, psycholinguistics, and studies the interaction and influence of language with culture, ethnos, and national mentality based on the principles of the anthropocentric paradigm .The object of this field is language and culture, and the subject is language units that show cultural semantics.
In this article the author analizes the differences between concept, notion and meaning and tries to give information about linguocultureme.
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
References
Anderson J. Cognitive psychology. 5th ed. St. Petersburg, 2002. – P. 164 - 165.
Askoldov S.A. Concept and word // Russian literature: Antol. – M., 1997. – P. 267-279.
Demyankov V.Z. Notion and concept in fiction and scientific language // Questions of Philology. - Moscow. 2001. No. 1. – P. 35 - 47.
Fillmore Ch. Frames and the Semantics of Understanding // Quaderni di semantica. Vol. VI, №2, 1985. – P. 46.
Hoshimov G'. M., Hoshimov M., et al. Definition, classification and translation problems of Lingvokulturema //Scientific discussion: problem, solution and achievement. Proceedings of the republic scientific-practical conference. - Tashkent, 2019. - B. 168 - 72.
Khudoyberganova D. Anthropocentric interpretation of artistic texts in the Uzbek language. Philol. science. doctor's diss. ... autoref. - Tashkent, 2015. - B. 5.
Kubryakova E.S., Demyankov V.Z., Pankrats Yu.G., Luzina L.G. A brief dictionary of cognitive terms. – M.: Education, 1996. – P. 93.
Lakoff G. Woman, Fire and Dangerous Things: What categories Reveal about the mind. – Chicago: The Univ. of Chicago Press, 1987. – 614 p.
Lukashevich E.V. Cognitive semantics: evolutionary-prognostic aspect. – M.; Barnaul, 2002. – P. 32.
Makhmudov N. Searching for perfect ways to study the language // EXCEED. - Tashkent. 2012. No. 5. – B. 6 - 7.
Stepanov Yu. S. In the three-dimensional space of language: Semiotic problems of linguistics, philosophy, art. – M., 1985. – P. 49.
Turniyozov N., Turniyozova K. Some comments on the frame and its pragmatic position // Pragmatics of translation. Proceedings of the republic scientific-practical conference. - Samarkand: SamDChTI, 2008. - B. 6-8.
Vorobiev V.V. Linguistic and cultural paradigm of personality. – M., Ross. Un - t. Friendship of Peoples, 1996. - P. 23 - 45.
Vorkachev S.G. Linguoculturology, linguistic personality, concept: The formation of an anthropological paradigm in linguistics // Philological sciences. 2001. No. 1. – P. 64.
Yusupov O'. About the terms meaning, understanding, and lingvocultureme. Stylistics in modern directions of linguistics//Proceedings of scientific and practical conference. - Tashkent. 2011. – B. 52 - 53.